Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+What\'s\s+up\s+at\s+5Gig\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+What\'s\s+up\s+at\s+5Gig\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] What's up at 5Gig? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:21:39 -0000; Got a note asking "what's the big deal at 5 GHz?"... Thought I'd comment on what I see, even though I'm far from an expert. Right now, 802.11b and g, in their lower 6 channels, overlap the amateur 2.; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00082.html (8,826 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] What's up at 5Gig? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 08:10:29 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Just like the internet only more expensive. Yawn. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RFI mailing li; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00084.html (7,160 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] What's up at 5Gig? (score: 1): Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:22:50 -0500; Just another data point ... at to the 5 GHz usage ... Eaton has a over the road radar system that also operates in this range ... as per their spec sheet. Next week we'll test and see if the new lab; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00086.html (6,979 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] What's up at 5Gig? (score: 1): Author: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:54:04 -0700; I seem to recall the smart tags used for automated toll collection run at 5.5 GHz or so, too. Cortland KA5S _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00087.html (7,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]