Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Why\s+we\s+badly\s+need\s+\"party\s+line\"\s+materials\s+for\s+all\s+hams\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:47:29 -0400
of audiences if or public Dave, I've always said the same thing. I'd even drag the Red Cross into it, if you find trash on their frequency. I would think a demonstration of airliners on HF (they mus
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00148.html (9,860 bytes)

22. Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: <dgsvetan@rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:51:01 -0500
Tom, I had concerns about using S-meters back when the Cedar Rapids BPL fiasco began. Just prior to that, I had begun the arduous task of calibrating my 4 or 5 HF receivers at home (cross-reference c
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00151.html (17,726 bytes)

23. Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:43:15 -0400
When it became the cals got done characteristics, I than nothing. Most radios I have seen are very repeatable band-by-band for dB change per S unit change. For example my IC751A's are all identical
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00152.html (11,117 bytes)

24. Re: [RFI] Why we badly need "party line" materials for all hams (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:35:52 EDT
Far more impressive is "This frequency is used for long range aircraft communication. Here is what it is supposed to sound like (cut to video of clear reception -- preferably with real time communica
/archives//html/RFI/2004-07/msg00153.html (9,426 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu