Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+distance\s+to\s+rfi\s+source\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+distance\s+to\s+rfi\s+source\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:53:45 -0600; I just had a visit from my local AEP rep, he was here to try to locate an rfi complaint I had called in. I let him hear the noise (sounds like a noise floor) (by that I mean no arcing just a steady h; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00066.html (6,984 bytes)
2. [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:21:45 -0800; I dont necessarily agree with the 80 and 160 meter comment. 160 meters can carry for miles on wires. With your numbers I would guess just outside 1/2 mile from my experience. The higher the freq you; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00067.html (6,899 bytes)
3. Re: [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: "RFI Services' Michael Martin" <mike@rfiservices.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:48:13 -0500; Absolutely not. Actually the rule of thumb, for lack of a better term at the moment, is just the opposite. RF signals usually travel further at lower frequencies. However this is also affected by the; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00071.html (7,788 bytes)
4. Re: [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:06:48 -0600; here is all the info I have so far: http://pages.suddenlink.net/k5oai/2011-rfi-noise.html the posted recordings are the ones that contained some buzz or something, I didn't save or post the ones that; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00072.html (8,468 bytes)
5. Re: [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: "Frank Haas KB4T" <kb4t@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 00:29:28 -0500; I am an Interference Investigator for an electric utility in Florida. Others on this list have more experience than I do and I have no argument with statements made here on this topic. I will share m; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00074.html (12,559 bytes)
6. Re: [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: "Brian Goldsmith" <brian.goldsmith@echo1.com.au>; Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:43:29 +1100; I am an Interference Investigator for an electric utility in Florida-- I will say this: If the interference is strong it's usually, but not always, easier to locate. Your mileage may vary!!!! (Ouch!); /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00075.html (7,654 bytes)
7. Re: [RFI] distance to rfi source? (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:47:46 -0600; Last night we had a little rain here, maybe 1/2 inch or so. and I was looking at the bands with the P3 again and seeing differences. Jan 5, 2011 I was seeing noise humps about every 110kc on 160m, 60; /archives//html/RFI/2011-01/msg00082.html (9,699 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]