Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+meter\s+RTTY\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+meter\s+RTTY\s+contest\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:06:39 -0800; The magic word: split. How about CQ TEST 1838 DE <YOURCALL> for the US guys and CQ TEST 1805 DE <THE EUROPEANS> ? Substitute your own favorite frequency. Works for me. 73, Bill W6WRT ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00001.html (6,729 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:22:39 +0000; Sounds perfect! and CQ TEST 1805 DE <THE EUROPEANS> ? I still cannot realize why we would use 1805 for RTTY. That is a prime CW frequency for DXing. Maybe someone will explain why we can't go higher; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00010.html (6,831 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <W4TV@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:03:31 -0500; Because 1810-1840 is heavily utilized for CW and CW DX activities. It has been a long and difficult time - not completely successful - getting all the pig farmers and good old boys to stay above 184; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00013.html (7,730 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: dezrat@copper.net; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:27:55 -0000; Bill, W6wrt _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00014.html (7,984 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Tom Homewood" <w1to@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:38:04 -0500; Most European countries can't operate below 1810, so I don't think 1805 is prime dx territory. 73, Tom, W1TO _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00017.html (7,653 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:51:22 +0000; Yes, but 1838 to 1842 IS the allocation for digital modes in IARU 1. This discrepancy in bandplans is just plain silly, I can't imagine what they were thinking of. CWers your side are just going to; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00024.html (8,206 bytes)
7. [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:03:00 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (from another thread) -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I too would like to see a 160 meter RTTY contest. I would suggest it use an already existing contest as a format, so no new contest softwar; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00365.html (7,993 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:42:47 -0700 (PDT); Can we at least pick a nicer name, rather than skirmish or melee (glad no one is using massacre)? How about roundup? Oops, that's already taken. Hoe down? Guess I'm officially a CO resident now. 73 -; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00366.html (8,092 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:49:23 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Since it will be a 160 meter contest, how about "The Stone Wall Head Bash". :-) As you might guess I have a love/hate relationship with 160. Mostly love, though.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00367.html (7,802 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "JT Croteau" <jt.n1ese@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:45:53 -0400; You must have not heard of the PSK31 Deathmatch. http://www.mdxa1.org/deathmatch.html -- JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00368.html (7,464 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:57:35 -0700 (PDT); Hey, 160 could have the "Steel [Farady] Cage Match". 160 is like transmitting inside a Farady cage anyway. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C/0, <jjreisert@alum.mit.e; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00369.html (8,371 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Don" <don@inbody.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:15:16 -0400; I remember this discussion a couple of years ago. Some of the "old hands" sent me some flamers telling me that 160m was a lousy place for a RTTY contest. Wonder what has changed. I had better go pull; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00370.html (9,236 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:21:23 +0000; I was one of those people. I'm not very active these days, but still alive :.) 160 is a miserable, noisy band. If you like listening to static crashes, great. However, a RTTY decoder is going to have; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00371.html (10,062 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:51:58 +0000; Then call the event Heavy Metal Tractor Pull! Or,"Honey, any thing around the house you need me to work on?" 73 Neal _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00372.html (11,385 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: IronmanY2k <IronmanY2K@triathlete.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:31:52 -0700; I think the Stew Perry Top Band challenge would be the best format to use for a new 160m contest. Of course we can try the RTTY Melee in Dec for now. 73, Jim AD6WL -- Message: 9 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 200; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00375.html (8,102 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:47:52 -0700; Hey, Cage Match--I like that one. Now, let see, where'd I put my steroids??? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00376.html (7,829 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:42:36 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- All true, but overcoming those is half the fun. I have eight states worked from my So Calif QTH, including Florida, Michigan and South Dakota. I don't recall any; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00379.html (8,703 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:34:21 -0400; W6WRT wrote: "There are not many "firsts" left in ham radio" I agree, however, I don't care to be the "first" to incur the wrath of the "regular" 160 meter enthusiasts. Most of them have spent untold; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00381.html (8,945 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:51:04 -0400; I do use receiving antennas on 160 (600 ft Beverage to EU and a rotatable loop for other directions) and still think RTTY on 160 is a bad idea. For those of you who want to try 160 and don't have the; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00383.html (9,569 bytes)
20. [RTTY] 160 meter RTTY contest (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:27:14 -0400; 73 Tony QBE ZUT DE WA4JQS ANTHONY W. (Tony) DePrato WA4JQS EXTRA - HEAVY Since 1962 CQ DX HALL OF FAME # 35 A1-OP FISTS # 10573 SKCC #1227 F.O.P. DXCC PHONE- DXCC CW- DXCC RTTY- DXCC MIXED DXCC 40,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00384.html (8,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]