Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+2013\s+Roundup\s+Results\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:03:56 -0700
YESSSS!!!! Please - please never tell me you've worked me before. I wouldn't call you if you were in my log. Maybe I screwed up and copied your call wrong, but just work me anyway. Someone posted som
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00086.html (10,245 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:07:24 -0400
If he logged him early, presumably the QSO would be marked invalid and not in the NIL list. It's likely the other guy logged K4WW early and thus the QSO was thrown out. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00087.html (11,849 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:17:15 -0500
Early on in my RTTY contesting days I sent the dreaded B4 to someone. After the other guy patiently explained he had a hard drive crash and lost his entire log I sent the exchange and wiped the B4 ma
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00088.html (10,879 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: Mark <n2qt@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:25:46 -0400
The ONLY exception to this rule is the guy who calls you three times (or more) in the past 40 minutes! Mark. N2QT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00089.html (11,402 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] 2013 roundup results (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:41:21 -0700
Speaking of working DX in RTTY Roundup, I noticed quite a few DX stations that had my exchange one more less than what I logged. I surmise this: DX actually worked me the first time. But I was unsure
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00090.html (11,735 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] 2013 roundup results (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:44:20 -0700
Commented on what? About what? 73 Jim W7RY I'm surprised that no one has commented on the screenshot at the end of the expanded report. Dr. Andy, K0SM, captured some 20m activity and there's a wealth
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00091.html (9,042 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:02:46 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Some time ago a guy worked me for my first Q of the contest and then called me again about one minute later. I worked him and then he called me again about a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00093.html (9,951 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] 2013 Roundup Results (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:22:48 -0500
Mark It was a YL in the AA contest 3 times, and I think she liked receiving 88 on cw. Quack The ONLY exception to this rule is the guy who calls you three times (or more) in the past 40 minutes! Mark
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00096.html (12,146 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] 2013 roundup results (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:17:52 -0400
Hector, An explanation why your correspondents have logged sequential numbers of past QSOs is simple. For sure you were running, you can verify it by checking your log. Then, during your run you had
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00103.html (11,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu