Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+40M\s+RTTY\s+band\s+plans\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 09:48:14 -0500
I can certainly understand that perspective from the west coast. But as I see it from the east coast, the reason is that in EU the 40M phone segment starts at 7050 or 7060, and all the EU guys like t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00037.html (8,308 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:58:23 +0000 (UTC)
Here's where the stations are, based on RBN data from BARTG https://public.tableau.com/views/BARTGRTTYSprint2016/FrequencybyContinent?:embed=y&:display_count=yes&:showTabs=y Rudy N2WQ From: Tim Shopp
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00038.html (10,394 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Jeffrey Smith <n5tit.tx@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 09:02:33 -0600
That is so cool Rudy, a picture is really worth a thousand words. 73's de Jeffrey N5TIT -- -- 73 DE Jeffrey N5TIT Sorter for the ARRL W5 Bureau "T" _______________________________________________ RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00039.html (11,374 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:12:12 -0500
Rudy, that's a brilliant set of graphs. Thank you so much! I'm going to see if I can do the same use reversebeacon data for other major RTTY contests. For BARTG I'm not surprised that the EU band pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00040.html (12,087 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:26:04 +0000 (UTC)
Tim, There is one limitation of the RBN data to keep in mind- the vast majority of RTTY skimmers have narrow segments due to the significant CPU requirements to process wide segments. I have set mine
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00041.html (12,127 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: post@lb3re.com
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:00:22 +0300
7020 ??? Are you out of mind??? 7040 is absolutly lowest on 40m for RTTY last 5 years!! It all mode going up in band is better I sit in HF commity of IARU region 1. We are enough complain about DQRM
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00043.html (14,325 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
It is hard to argue with the actual RBN data. Data from JA skimmers from CQ WW RTTY 2015 shows Japanese stations in the 7023-28 segment. Rudy N2WQ From: "post@lb3re.com" <post@lb3re.com> To: Rudy Bak
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00044.html (13,863 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: post@lb3re.com
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:23:41 +0300
Well Then they must fix it in region 3. There need to be new common rules for rbn sir. :) Much better keep up in band when finally got 100khz extra for" years!!" søndag, 07 februar 2016, 05:04p.m. +0
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00045.html (15,422 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:28:09 -0500
"7040 is absolutly lowest on 40m for RTTY last 5 years!!" Not really. Many European stations as far down as 7.029. Some as far back in time as 2002 in my log. 73, Larry W6NWS I sit in HF commity of I
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00046.html (14,365 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:15:28 +0000
Must be a language thing. Otherwise I don't know why there needs to be "rules" for rbn because it receives amateurs operating legally in regions 2&3 The bottom end of RTTY is 7040 in regions 1 and 2,
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00050.html (16,996 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:22:53 +0000
Not stated below but presumably well-known is top of RTTY in US is 7125 Must be a language thing. Otherwise I don't know why there needs to be "rules" for rbn because it receives amateurs operating l
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00051.html (17,653 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:33:24 -0600
I saw quite a number of spots from guys grumbling about VP8SGI running RTTY on 7040 and that being a JT or some other digital mode special frequency. Guess they have not heard the rule with respect t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00052.html (18,147 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: SHARON TOLBERT <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:45:21 -0500 (EST)
I saw quite a number of spots from guys grumbling about VP8SGI running RTTY on 7040 and that being a JT or some other digital mode special frequency. Guess they have not heard the rule with respect t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00053.html (18,681 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:02:07 -0600
WSPR beacons Jeff. The QRP cw guys have been complaining about it for awhile. Poor choice of frequency for what's mostly unattended beacons. Ron K0IDT The group of guys sitting on an iceberg at the b
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00054.html (9,130 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: FireBrick <bill@w9ol.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:18:46 -0600
Right On Jeff. And if you can't hear that pileup...well you really should be fixing your equipment. Ron K0IDT The group of guys sitting on an iceberg at the bottom of the world, literally risking the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00055.html (9,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu