Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5NN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5NN\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:18:29 -0800; I don't think the minuscule speed decrease is a factor. In my mind, it just Ed is spot on, but there is a little more to it. I'm acclimated to TOO. I know a SHIFT got corrupted AND I know NUMBER is c; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00198.html (7,487 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:52:43 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Everyone should have a macro or two that sends only the important part of the exchange, i.e. no calls, no 599, etc. When asked for a repeat in a contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00202.html (6,780 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Rich <rwnewbould@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:15:27 -0500; Agreed, but W0YK suggested to me that these keys be programmed with the info just once. Then press the key as many times as you would like to send that data. So you could send just the serial no. onc; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00203.html (7,764 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:59:05 -0800; YES! Ive learned a bunch from W0YK but this is one of the biggies. It seems so obvious yet I never thought of it. It makes your macros completely adaptable to conditions. At least a dozen times in S&; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00205.html (8,889 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:50:09 -0800; Six repeats of a serial number may be appropriate in some instances but certainly not all, and I would argue not even the majority of instances. Based on conditions and the specific moment the repeat; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00210.html (8,880 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:52:59 -0800; Another busted myth ... that RTTY contesters have to repeat their callsign many times! Ed W0YK __________________________________________________________ At least a dozen times in S&P pile ups I woul; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00212.html (7,052 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:19:21 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I agree, six times may be excessive in some instances, but here's my thinking: I always run high power and a beam on the high bands and good, efficient w; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00215.html (8,217 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:33:47 -0500; Often I am leery of asking for repeats, since the station is likely to send the whole exchange again and I still may not get what I am looking for. I really like Ed's idea of hitting the F-key multip; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00217.html (9,172 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Rich <rwnewbould@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:53:56 -0500; If you add a CR/LF to the end of the macro it will print on a new line each time. Make sure you add space to the end of the macro (123<space> so they do not print "123123123" if you choose not to use; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00220.html (9,736 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:59:34 -0800; Actually, I have [My Call] programmed two different ways on two different Fn keys. One has a CR/LF at the beginning and the other does not. I can select which one to use depending on what I'm trying; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00221.html (9,148 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:57:54 -0500; If you ask for a repeat, you are likely to get a repeat of everything. But if you specify what you want repeated, then you should only get that. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ________; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00224.html (10,396 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:10:50 -0800; Last weekend, in 19 out of 20 cases when I sent NR? NR? I received an exact repeat of the original exchange message rather than just the serial number I asked for. Less than 5% of stations replied wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00226.html (8,417 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:03:47 -0500; Regardless what particularly you ask for a repeat, you will only get what people had pre-programmed before the contest. If there is just a single macro containing a full exchange, that's the only thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00229.html (9,411 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: lu3hy-lt0h <lu3hy.lt0h@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:48:04 -0300; I think the problem is so Vlad says, RTTY contesters no have prepared another macro, When I ask ?? NR .- AGN.... send the same, Even worse it is sending LT0H LT0H 599 599 001 001 DE xxxxx xxxxx for r; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00234.html (9,924 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:06:11 -0800; If the station does not have a message programmed to just send the serial number, they can easily go to keyboard mode and type the serial number only several times. Ed W0YK __________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00235.html (8,646 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] 5NN (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:19:56 -0500; Now you have identified the problem. How do we make reading this list mandatory before participating in a contest? Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00236.html (10,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]