Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5bwas\s+rtty\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5bwas\s+rtty\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Ka3pva@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:58:48 EST; as many of you might know i am working toward 5bwas rtty...little did i know how much of a chore it is to collect the cards...i have 137 so far...i still need many states on several bands...pls send; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00179.html (6,602 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:12:34 -0600; Do I owe you any cards? I try to respond to all requests but sometimes get a month or more behind in replying. I have an insane goal of WAS without ever requesting a card! Mixed mode the only state I; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00187.html (7,616 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:56:13 -0500 (CDT); Sorry to recycle an old thread ... but .... I'm starting to get cards back from some big SASE mailings I did in Feb and Mar. I purposely sent out cards after some of the bigger contests knowing that; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00070.html (7,416 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:03:14 -0500; Hopefully I am not among the guilty. If so let me know and I will rectify the situation provided you are in the log. Once in a while I get a QSL for a time when I was not on the air. 73 W0ETC On Mon,; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00071.html (8,584 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Michael Furfari" <k3fh@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 23:48:13 -0400; Pete, I can't find u anywhere in my log, surprising since I have been doing most RTTY contests for several years tho not a big gun at all I do work most of the folks posting this list.... I hope the; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00072.html (9,210 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:00:21 -0700 (PDT); Hi Peter, I sympathize with your frustration. I have cards in hand for 5BWAS (mixed-mode) and am slowly working on all RTTY. I try to repond to any direct QSLs sent within a couple of weeks, and I lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00076.html (8,723 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:03:24 -0400; If anyone needs PA, I respond to all QSLs. For stateside, SASE required and immediate reply. For DX, all replies via buro (unless SAE/IRC or greenstamp included), mailed once a year. Barry W2UP -- Ba; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00079.html (9,563 bytes)
8. RE: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:12:01 -0500; What is your experience with the BURO? I sent a bunch of cards out that way recently, but have no real understanding as to how long it may take for the cards to reach their recipients. As with most e; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00080.html (10,315 bytes)
9. RE: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:17:22 -0700 (PDT); First, keep in mind there is no QSL bureau for domestic QSOs. You are on your own here. I use the bureau to respond to cards (received through the bureau) but don't use the bureau for QSOs for which; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00082.html (8,307 bytes)
10. RE: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 12:12:03 -0400; I usually receive 3 or 4 buro shipments per year. It's usually a box sent UPS (I do a lot of CW and some SSB contesting, too). Some cards received are under a year old. Most are 1-3 years, and I've r; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00083.html (12,494 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 17:25:21 +0100; Peter Laws wrote: Is it because I don't use fancy QSL label software More likely the reason is that *they* use a computerized system, that is set up to produce one card per station, and they simply d; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00084.html (8,275 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:44:28 -0500 (CDT); I don't care if it's one card/QSO or just a label with all the QSOs as long as all the QSOs I QSLed are CFMd! Certainly one card is cheaper. I went through my logs and found the stations that I had o; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00100.html (8,348 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 5bwas rtty (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT); When I do this, I cross out the QSO block on the front of the card, write --OVER-- in big letters and put ALL QSOs on the back. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00101.html (8,254 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]