Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+75\s+Baud\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+75\s+Baud\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:31:04 +0100; Did anyone notice that the Ukrainian RTTY contest in 2 weeks time is 75 Baud only? http://www.izmail-dx.com/ The last time I took part it was in November at 45 Baud. Is it a new contest or a change i; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00279.html (6,373 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "UT1IA Vladimir" <ut1ia@ukr.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:09:14 -0800; The Ukrainian DX Contest (1st full weekend of November) modes are CW and SSB only, no RTTY mode any more since 2007. See Rules: http://www.ucc.zp.ua/urdxc2009rules_eng.htm The Ukrainian DX DIGI Conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00285.html (8,431 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:47:30 -0700; Same weekend as the US and Canada ARRL Field Day event. Don't expect much participation from the US or Canada. We'll be on 45 baud RTTY, CW and SSB. 73 Jim W7RY ______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00287.html (9,230 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:58:26 -0500; Field Day! One of the GREAT opportunities to teach operators different aspects of amateur radio. For example, how to change RTTY speeds between 45 and 75 Baudot with simple macros. And how easy it is; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00288.html (10,841 bytes)
5. [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:44:31 -0400; Gents, Please be more careful with what we already have by now, i.e the 45 Baud RTTY. This mode is very well established and popular. Moreover, it sits firmly in some radios' hardware. Now that there; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00297.html (8,657 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:12:36 -0700; I couldn't agree more Vlad! And very well articulated! * * *Keep RTTY 45 baud!* When the noise came in about the* opportunity *for Field Day, It simply went into the trash. 73 Jim W7RY ______________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00300.html (9,781 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:49:54 -0500; Who said anything about not keeping 45 Baud RTTY? People need to read and comprehend the content of these messages. Read it again and tell me what YOU think I said, please! But I'll give you a head s; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00301.html (12,292 bytes)
8. [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs.lists@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:41:31 -0400; Gents, Please be more careful with what we already have by now, i.e the 45 Baud RTTY. This mode is very well established and popular. Moreover, it sits firmly in some radios' hardware. Now that there; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00308.html (9,310 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:36:02 -0500; 75 Baud RTTY is like putting Lime in Beer. Interesting, but not needed. Beer (like 45 Baud RTTY) is fine the way it is. Clint - W5CPT Gents, Please be more careful with what we already have by now, i; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00309.html (9,844 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:36:44 -0500; Let's remove the clutter and simplify the original statement to: "<Item of choice>" is like putting Lime in Beer. Interesting, but not needed. Beer is fine the way it is. Now choose your "item of cho; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00312.html (12,506 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:51:57 -0700; Then how do you explain the popularity of CW Bob? Have you ever listened to the CW portion of the band during a contest weekend? Why hasn't EVERYONE moved to some fancy new digital mode instead of CW; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00317.html (13,990 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:04:38 -0500; You bet I have listened. Actually I'm probably one of the stations operating in the mix. CW is my favorite mode. That said, there are no speed regulations on CW. If you want to operate at 15 wpm or 2; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00328.html (14,432 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:47:29 -0500; And if adaptive speeds were part of how RTTY works, maybe that would be germaine, but since it doesn't ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00339.html (8,832 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:23:33 -0500; How does the lack of an adaptive speed decoder make any difference? On CW, you hear the speed difference and mentally shift to a faster decoding schema. On RTTY, you hear the speed difference and cli; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00343.html (10,563 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:33:46 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Perhaps we need software that automatically changes speeds with hand conditions. A couple of scenarios come to mind: 1. You CQ at 75 baud. If the replying station is having t; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00345.html (9,767 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:50:38 -0700 (PDT); I believe PACTORII did that. You connected at the slower speed and if the through put was good it went to the higher speed. I also think that some guys had this feature controlling the ALC of the r; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00346.html (10,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]