Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+A\s+repository\s+of\s+\(poor\)\s+RTTY\s+recordings\?\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:53:25 -0700
It is perhaps useful for the RTTY community to have available a "standard" collection of digitized sound files of various RTTY signals. Not the clean loud stuff that we already have on the web as exa
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00200.html (9,537 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Ekki Plicht <ep@plicht.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:09:08 +0200
Am Di April 20 2004 22:53 schrieb Kok Chen: Good idea. [snip] Sure, I still have plenty of space left on my domain. I don't have sound files (yet), but will try to gather some. FWIW, a while ago I co
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00201.html (9,119 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Terry" <terry@ab5k.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:28:00 -0500
I can do a FTP host or put them on a web page on the site here. I recently compared three KAM's to MMTTY. The test was simple find a RTTY signal and add attenuation to the receiver until the signal
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00204.html (11,804 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:30:33 -0500
(not Hi Ekki! I have to jump in and throw in my own annecdote that I've seen my PROII decoder catch something that MMTTY missed! I think the decoding of the PROII is pretty good - but I keep clickin
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00205.html (8,969 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:36:35 -0000
Hi, let me add some comments about RTTY copy with the PTC-II. Walter, DL4RCK and myself bugged the programmmer of the PTC-II firmware about this less than optimal RTTY performance several times many
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00206.html (10,923 bytes)

6. RE: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:47:06 -0500
Anyone up for 20M RTTY QSO. 14.0845 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL Hi, let me add some comments about RTTY copy with the PTC-II. Walter, DL4RCK and myself bugged the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00208.html (11,290 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:50:36 -0700
I used a KAM Plus for several years but sold it after buying a P38 (at Dayton in 1998) and later using MMTTY too. I had modified the KAM to allegedly improve performance with weak signals. I apparent
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00216.html (13,027 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:52:33 -0700
Is there a display setting for the PROII that has larger text for the RTTY decoder? It's a real eye exam for me. Jim N7US (not Hi Ekki! I have to jump in and throw in my own annecdote that I've seen
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00217.html (9,878 bytes)

9. RE: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:10:06 -0400
I have a KAM '98, which I use with MMTTY for RTTY Dxing. WinWarbler lets me run both simultaneously, displaying the received characters from each in adjacent (over/under) panes. While MMTTY generally
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00219.html (14,574 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:22:22 -0700
On Apr 20, 2004, at 8:10 PM, Dave Bernstein wrote: I have a KAM '98, which I use with MMTTY for RTTY Dxing. WinWarbler lets me run both simultaneously, displaying the received characters from each in
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00221.html (9,268 bytes)

11. RE: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Bernstein" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:39:48 -0400
I don't believe that's currently possible within one instance of MMTTY, but defer to Oba-san. One could instantiate three copies of the MMTTY engine, allow the user to independently specify a profile
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00222.html (10,135 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:44:02 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Would it be a good idea to come up with a standard text message we could all use for this? I'm thinking if we knew in advance exactly what wa
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00225.html (10,739 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:56:29 -0000
HI Bill, you do not want to reinvent "THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOGS BACK", do you? ;-) 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Turner" <wrt@dslextreme.com> To:
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00227.html (12,410 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:25:24 -0500
Hey, how about 599599599599599599599599599..... It's about all we send anyway! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00232.html (8,776 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:46:16 -0400
Chen, RITTY does a form of what you are suggesting. It will attempt to decode a callsign and upon a second occurrence of the pattern it will try to reconstruct a "correct" callsign of the two differe
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00233.html (11,390 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:50:01 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I wanted a file that could be used by anyone, not just English-speaking people. RYRY would be better, wouldn't it? -- 73, Bill W6WRT QSLs via
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00235.html (8,780 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:17:58 -0500
At 09:56 AM 4/21/2004 +0000, DJ3IW Goetz wrote: HI Bill, you do not want to reinvent "THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOGS BACK", do you? ;-) Well i always liked NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00238.html (9,171 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:30:43 -0400
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 at 11:17:58 -0500 Tony DePrato wrote: At 09:56 AM 4/21/2004 +0000, DJ3IW Goetz wrote: HI Bill, you do not want to reinvent "THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOGS BACK", do
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00244.html (7,419 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:28:27 -0700
_________________________________________________________ With all due respect Richard, I think it does matter what the text is. Which of the following would be easier to find errors in: GMANCUDKLJER
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00250.html (8,102 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] A repository of (poor) RTTY recordings? (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:00:48 -0400
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:28:27 -0700 Bill Turner wrote: With all due respect Richard, I think it does matter what the text is. Which of the following would be easier to find errors in: GMANCUDKLJERJKSL
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00257.html (10,948 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu