Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+AA5AU\s+SARTG\s+Score\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Mon Aug 18 15:58:43 2003
SARTG WW RTTY Contest Call: AA5AU Operator(s): AA5AU Station: AA5AU Class: SOAB HP QTH: LA Operating Time (hrs): 15.5 Radios: SO2R Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 10 100 11 40: 40 470 29 20: 219
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00237.html (9,156 bytes)

2. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
Date: Mon Aug 18 20:12:27 2003
"Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "What really pushed me to compete hard in the last two periods was a US station with a 5 callsign not signing / portable the area he was in." Until conte
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00239.html (7,795 bytes)

3. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: w2up at mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Mon Aug 18 21:11:00 2003
I thought it WAS required. I had some time available last weekend, and was considering operating SARTG, but decided not to when I saw that rule about signing portable. International contest sponsors
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00242.html (8,640 bytes)

4. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Mon Aug 18 21:28:22 2003
It makes for a good argument either way. I understand a station not wanting to sign portable/call area. However, if call area locations are going to be multipliers, then stations should sign portable
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00243.html (10,169 bytes)

5. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: k5ww at wcsonline.net (Gert E. Janssens)
Date: Mon Aug 18 22:23:56 2003
The rules for SARTG say: "NOTE: Stations operating from call areas other than their call ID, are asked to use '/x' for their actual call area, i.e. K5DJ/1." The word "asked" often gets "misinterprete
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00246.html (9,474 bytes)

6. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: llindblom at juno.com (llindblom@juno.com)
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:13:17 2003
As always it seems many North Americans only understand imperatives like "must" or "shall." My all time favorites are the stations who sometimes sign portable and sometimes don't. This is typically d
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00247.html (10,271 bytes)

7. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: kenb at brookner.com (Ken Brookner)
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:53:21 2003
i have a 5-land call and live in 7-land. i don't sign portable under any circumstances anymore. i used to, but caught flack from dx about doing so in contests. because of the various master call data
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00248.html (12,067 bytes)

8. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: wrt at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Tue Aug 19 11:46:33 2003
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:53:02 -0700, "Ken Brookner" <kenb@brookner.com> wrote: _________________________________________________________ I agree, also being "out of area". There's nothing wrong with u
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00249.html (9,260 bytes)

9. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: doncassel at compuserve.com (Don Cassel)
Date: Tue Aug 19 12:03:57 2003
Okay, I'll be a contrarian. As an outsider I would prefer to see the portable designation. There are times when beam headings are important from here such as when a W6 is really in /1 or some variati
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00250.html (10,822 bytes)

10. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: w2up at mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Tue Aug 19 12:13:32 2003
Let me get this straight. You mean signing "portable" is just a suggestion, not a requirement? What's the point of a contest rule if it's optional? How about: If running high power, it is asked that
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00251.html (11,542 bytes)

11. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: llindblom at juno.com (llindblom@juno.com)
Date: Tue Aug 19 12:52:58 2003
Based on my experience from living in deferent localities both in and outside of the USA, "asked" in the USA is treated as a suggestion. In other areas "asked" is considered an imperative or shall do
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00252.html (11,970 bytes)

12. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: wrt at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:01:50 2003
_________________________________________________________ I suggest that if areas are important to contest sponsors, they make them part of the exchange instead of part of the call. Many contests alr
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00253.html (8,870 bytes)

13. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw at t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:06:09 2003
Hello, following this thread, the subject of signing call/x seems to be a real problem for (some?) stateside contesters. Barry, W2UP requested "International contest sponsors need to realize that the
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00254.html (14,691 bytes)

14. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: wrt at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:13:14 2003
_________________________________________________________ If the rules for a foreign-sponsored contest are published in English for English-speaking people, there is an implied requirement to have th
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00255.html (7,898 bytes)

15. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: chen at mac.com (Kok Chen)
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:43:12 2003
Hi Goetz, I guess there are three things you can do for contests which uses call areas as mults. 1) make it mandatory to send the call area as a portable if the contester is out of area. I have mysel
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00256.html (9,202 bytes)

16. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: wrt at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
Date: Tue Aug 19 13:46:57 2003
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:05:03 -0000, dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz) wrote: Yes, but through the "vanity" program, callsigns can easily be changed to whatever the applicant wants. I expect the FCC som
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00257.html (11,040 bytes)

17. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: s57aw at hamradio.si (Robert Bajuk)
Date: Tue Aug 19 14:48:27 2003
Hello, I agree with Goetz at that point. We - non USA hams are sometimes in a very ungrateful situation when trying to make contest rules equal as much as possible for all the contestants. We would l
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00261.html (11,848 bytes)

18. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: w2up at mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Tue Aug 19 14:57:05 2003
Hi Goetz, About 25(?) years ago, our FCC dropped the signing portable requirement. At one time, prior to that, it was required to sign /x. It was also required to notify the FCC of portable operation
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00262.html (16,755 bytes)

19. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: dk3vn at nexgo.de (Waldemar DK3VN)
Date: Tue Aug 19 15:40:19 2003
Griiiiiiiiin! ~:) ~:) ~:) Double U's and DL's are more similar, than most people believe and we have learned, that we DL's are living in "Old Europe". ~:) 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN -- Check RWRL on http:
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00264.html (8,077 bytes)

20. [RTTY] AA5AU SARTG Score (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw at t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Tue Aug 19 15:58:23 2003
Hello, there have been many polite and considerate answers to my mail on this subject - thank you all! I will make it a discussion item at an upcoming meeting of the DL-DX RTTY Contest sponsors. 73 d
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00265.html (8,458 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu