Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\'s\s+WinLink\s+initiative\s+and\s+Pactor\s+III\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\'s\s+WinLink\s+initiative\s+and\s+Pactor\s+III\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1): Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:27:11 +0000; The ARRL's recent endorsement of WinLink 2000 for EMCOMM ARES use raises some interesting questions for RTTY and other HF digital modes. WinLink 2000 can use Pactor for HF links and supports Pactor I; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00078.html (7,385 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1): Author: "Thomas K" <tom_k@abwesend.de>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:03:42 +0200 (MEST); Hi Phil ! Since you have not realized YET that those PACTOR-III stations are out there ... you should not have a problem !!!! I think Pactor-III has been availiable for about more than 2 years now !; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00086.html (8,799 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1): Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:31:25 -0400; Tom is quite correct. Personally, I think the ARRL did the right thing in endorsing WinLink and Pactor-II and -III for ARES. It is the most robust and error-free of the digital modes. The system work; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00087.html (7,200 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1): Author: Phil Duff NA4M <na4m@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:18:05 +0000; At 06:03 8/11/2004, Thomas K wrote: Since you have not realized YET that those PACTOR-III stations are out there ... you should not have a problem !!!! Yes - that's why I asked. I've never been inter; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00092.html (10,386 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] ARRL's WinLink initiative and Pactor III (score: 1): Author: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <sford@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:22:29 -0400; Phil: Yes, it has. You'll find it on the ARRLWeb at: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/ The FCC has been made aware of the publication as well. 73 . . . Steve, WB8IMY Yes - that's; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00093.html (10,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]