Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\.org\s+Vote\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\.org\s+Vote\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 15:35:17 -0700; The www.arrl.org web site has a survey running for your favorite digital mode. (Main page, last panel on right.) PSK31 is winning over RTTY by 583 to 205 votes. 832 unwashed masses also voted. Vote e; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00342.html (7,204 bytes)
2. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:04:20 -0500; Time to get the vote out! Thanks Chen.; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00344.html (7,897 bytes)
3. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: deuxfox@earthlink.net (deuxfox); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 23:34:08 +0000; Right on, but.... any ideas why PSK is so far ahead? I have a couple of thoughts about it which I haven't fully clarified for myself yet. Don KF2XF; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00345.html (7,280 bytes)
4. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:48:37 -0700; Barry voted many times? Seriously, my observation is that, unless there is a contest going on, you can usually find more PSK31 signals on the air than RTTY. Lots of guys with 25 watts and a dipole, I; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00346.html (7,248 bytes)
5. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 23:59:44 -0000; Because it's a better mode? I did a couple of RTTY Roundups with PSK31 and I really liked it. In the early days of PSK31, where you had to tune manually in 10 Hz increments to get print, I can see wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00347.html (8,311 bytes)
6. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: sjolin@swbell.net (Dave Sjolin); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:03:37 -0500; I would say because those voting are NOT just dxers and contesters. The total probably includes all the unwashed, the qrpers, etc. It probably includes a lot of young people who are new to ham radio; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00348.html (7,978 bytes)
7. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:53:31 -0500; Baudot sounds better (my #1 reason). You can run a BIG amp if you want and not wipe out the whole band (although you can also run a BIG amp AND wipe out the whole band if you aren't set right). Bette; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00350.html (7,531 bytes)
8. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 01:38:59 -0000; Sorry Chen, but I haven't voted yet. BTW, is HF Packet a choice? :.) Barry -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00351.html (8,061 bytes)
9. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: k2yg@verizon.net (k2yg@verizon.net); Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 22:56:47 -0500; Why is psk ahead in the vote? 1. Free software 2. No hardware 3. Simple to set up. It's easy to fool most of the people some of the time. 73 Dave K2YG To: <rtty@contesting.com>; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00355.html (7,319 bytes)
10. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: dhb@attbi.com (Dave, AA6YQ); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 01:03:24 -0400; That's all true of RTTY with MMTTY, so not a compelling explanation. Personally, I think its the lower case... 73, Dave, AA6YQ Why is psk ahead in the vote? 1. Free software 2. No hardware 3. Simple; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00356.html (7,950 bytes)
11. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 07:21:55 -0400; MMTTY has the same characteristics. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00357.html (7,210 bytes)
12. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: TAWNSg@aol.com (TAWNSg@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:13:50 EDT; Could we have a contest for old timers like myself so we can dust the cob webs off the old 50 Baud machines,I'll even risk an hernia lifting my old cheetah telex machine back into the upstairs shack.; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00358.html (6,925 bytes)
13. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:18:46 -0700; _________________________________________________________ PSK31 is also attractive because of the "waterfall" display, however I think that is one of its greatest drawbacks too, because it discourage; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00361.html (7,723 bytes)
14. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:59:49 -0400; Bill et al, The 756 PRO permits adjustment of the SSB DSP filter bandwidth down to 50 Hz. However the "center" frequency is fixed at 1500 Hz. I use this method for RTTY and select about 500 Hz for co; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00362.html (9,233 bytes)
15. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote (score: 1): Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 04:21:51 -0400 (EDT); Bill et al, The 756 PRO permits adjustment of the SSB DSP filter bandwidth down to 50 Hz. However the "center" frequency is fixed at 1500 Hz. I use this method for RTTY and select about 500 Hz for co; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00368.html (8,189 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]