- 1. [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
- Author: Ed Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:16:41 -0600
- Realistically folks, We gained an 80 meter phone band which is lightly populated ... (3600-3800). The beef with 11708 was putting wideband where other modes (read narrow band low power) were presentl
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00007.html (8,190 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:37:36 -0500
- The beef with 11708 was putting wideband where other modes (read narrow band low power) were presently operating. The proposal *still* does nothing to prevent wideband modes from operating where othe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00009.html (9,647 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 23:39:04 -0600
- Ed, Joe has answered most of your points pretty well but he missed a few Lastly, divulge un- encrypting methods for select OO's to police the traffic so rendered. There recently was congratulatory em
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00010.html (7,619 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
- Author: Mark n2qt <n2qt.va@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:05:13 -0500
- Be sure to read the article Seven Seas Shack in Feb. QST. for more on the use of WinLink. in a way I thought, would garner support. (As he was using it for aRRL bulletins and propagation reports). Ma
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00011.html (8,346 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu