Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+Bandwidth\s+proposal\s+$dup$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+Bandwidth\s+proposal\s+$dup$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (dup) (score: 1): Author: psussman@pactor.com; Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:27:31 -0500; (Did this get posted originally? I didn't 'see' a copy) Joe raises an `excellent point. When PACTOR-1 was released by SCS, the protocol was made freely available. AEA and MFJ made drastic cuts to the; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00373.html (9,144 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (dup) (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:17:19 -0500; Intellectually, no, I can't blame them and intellectually do support them. However, from an *economic* point of view, I recall the PACTOR-2 modems running around $1000 (!), give or take. As an *amate; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00392.html (7,888 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (dup) (score: 1): Author: psussman@pactor.com; Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:46:35 -0500; Thanks for the comments, Carter. Hams being frugal is nothing new. The guys who invented PACTOR were fugal hams, too. Their commerical stuff sells for a lot more of those frugal dollars than their le; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00399.html (9,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]