Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+Request\s+for\s+Member\s+comment\s+on\s+Proposed\s+HF\s+Band\s+PlanChange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+Request\s+for\s+Member\s+comment\s+on\s+Proposed\s+HF\s+Band\s+PlanChange\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band PlanChange (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 20:33:25 -0600; The problem is that the League is saying they want input - and presumably will respect the input received. But so far, their actions have been to move forward with their pro-email-via-HF position - r; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00005.html (12,241 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band PlanChange (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:06:00 -0500; The issue is that ARRL is not willing to ask the FCC to move the "automatic control subbands) out of the heavily used RTTY (and PSK, JT-mode, etc.) sub-bands and eliminate them completely on the exce; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00006.html (13,407 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Request for Member comment on Proposed HF Band PlanChange (score: 1): Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:26:08 -0600; Jeff I sent in my comments to the committee and requested they make the comments and survey results public since they have a track record of not being up front in the past. I don't know if it will go; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00008.html (8,689 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]