Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+band\/mode\s+awards\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+band\/mode\s+awards\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:39:51 -0700; I wonder why the ARRL is so determined to limit the variety of awards available. In this age of computers, why not make any possible combination of bands and modes available? If someone wants to appl; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00147.html (7,142 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 10:25:45 -0500; Bill, I have always wondered how the League keeps in sync with the interests and desires of it's members? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie I wonder why the ARRL is so determined t; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00149.html (8,589 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:50:59 -0400; Hi Bill, Two issues here I guess. One is ARRL awards -- DXCC is limited to just three unique but broad modulation formats: CW, Phone, Digital on a plethora of combinations of bands. I think you have; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00150.html (9,923 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 08:51:36 -0700 (PDT); Like Bill, I also have wondered why they don't offer more awards via LoTW. They started to expand by offering WPX, but then did not follow up with WAZ like they had announced at one time. I have noti; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00151.html (10,277 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:06:49 -0400; Like Bill, I also have wondered why they don't offer more awards via LoTW. development resources. At the recent ARRL Board of Directors meeting, positive first steps were taken to address this situa; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00152.html (8,454 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:23:51 -0500; I think that the matrix of awards cheapens the whole thing. Much like "winning" CQ WW because you had the highest score of all the Single Op, Single Band stations in your state running only a triband; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00000.html (7,719 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:03:28 -0700; Peter, Actually, Phone is mentioned in the rules, page 1, under Number 5. Granted, it's an off-hand mention, but it is there. 73, Jim N6VH modulation format for DXCC. They already do that for WAS (ex; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00001.html (8,674 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:03:37 -0500; Mentioned, yes, but not that you can get it for every conceivable "sub mode" of phone. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00002.html (7,240 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 07:30:23 -0400 (EDT); Hi Peter, You might want to rethink this a bit. These minor categories stimulate more activity and allow small stations to compete at their own level, all the time providing more fodder for the big g; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00003.html (7,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]