Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Additional\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+Serial\s+Number\s+Repeats\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:35:40 -0800
I'm probably preaching to the choir, but here goes anyway. You know, in the cosmic scheme of wasting time, repeating serial number one, two, three, or more times is probably down in the noise. Here a
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00086.html (9,022 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:49:38 -0500
Hank: The only time it is OK to send 599 more than once is when serial number is 599, then 599 599 599 is OK, but maybe 599 SN 599 599 is better? --Mike, WV2ZOW ______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00087.html (9,935 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 23:40:28 +0000
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, please everyone send your call twice. That way, when you are all QRMing each other, I send mine three times. Guess which call prints? 73, Bill W6WRT
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00088.html (7,715 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Ian Szekeres <iszekeres@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:51:33 -0600
Heh, the weiner who tacks his call on after your third one sends! I almost fell out of my chair laughing this past contest. While running, two guys went almost 30 seconds trying to one-up each other.
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00089.html (8,097 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@gmx.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:57:17 -0800
Ill bet I work at least 10% of my S&P Qs by sending my call once. Especially on big pileups. Everyone jostles for some time, then suddenly..silence. Drop my call in once and the guy comes back. Never
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00090.html (8,711 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: "Kermit \(aka Ken\) via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:08:17 -0500
Maybe this is the moment for : 5NN 599 599 73, Ken, AB1J Hank: The only time it is OK to send 599 more than once is when serialnumber is 599, then 599 599 599 is OK, but maybe 599 SN 599 599 isbetter
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00091.html (11,706 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:44:28 +0000
After QSO 598, I enter it again as a dupe, nr 599. Then the next station gets nr 600 from me. 73, Mark, K5AM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00092.html (8,402 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:46:57 -0800
Do anything special after QSO 665...? :D - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/ Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak RTTY op at W7RN _
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00093.html (8,996 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:13:43 -0500
Duh! I never thought of that. Do I have to pay royalties on this, Mark? 73, Mark, K5AM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00094.html (8,652 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:48:18 -0500
I didn't sign his contract, so to me its just another number. --Mike, WV2ZOW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00095.html (10,028 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:46:31 -0500
Thank you Hank (W6SX) for the advice. Constructive advice from seasoned contesters always welcome. I will check my macros. Am sure room for improvement. But I have a hard time deleting TU from my mac
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00096.html (11,029 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Keith Maton <g6nhu@me.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:58:36 +0000
I have no problem with someone replying to me sending my callsign. It confirms to me that theyve got it correct - Sometimes it does happen that theyve made a mistake. My short callsign is M7P and Ive
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00099.html (11,923 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Additional Thoughts on Serial Number Repeats (score: 1)
Author: Keith Maton <g6nhu@me.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:15:44 +0000
If anyone is interested, its here: http://qso365.co.uk/2012/11/data-contesting-the-anatomy-of-an-ideal-qso/ <http://qso365.co.uk/2012/11/data-contesting-the-anatomy-of-an-ideal-qso/> 73 Keith G6NHU _
/archives//html/RTTY/2018-02/msg00103.html (11,818 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu