Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+An\s+open\s+letter\s+to\s+Shelby\,\s+K4WW\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:26:01 -0400
Hi Shelby. As the "instigator" of the current SO1R vs. SO2R thread, I have been following the collective comments with interest. With the exception of some mini-flames and clearly unworkable suggesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00273.html (7,901 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:17:48 -0400
I'm not really into contesting anymore, but I agree with Rick and Shelby that something ought to be done to separate the average Joe, SO1R, operation from the obsessive point gatherers. Call it "Unli
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00275.html (9,968 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Professional Home Inspections" <Paul@ProHomeInspector.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:29:37 -0400
I totally agree with Rick Paul K2DB Message: 1 Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:26:01 -0400 From: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com> Subject: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW To: "RTTY Mailing List
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00279.html (8,883 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:37:36 -0500
Shelby, As an active member of the RTTY community who helped fan the flames on this topic, everyone should already know I support your decision. I also want to commend the digital community on the li
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00282.html (9,960 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:38:32 -0400
Unfortunately, this effort to exile SO2R to the ghetto is dead wrong. SOmR has been a fixture of contesting for 30 years that I know about ... I played with SO2R in the late 70's as AD8I in the Colum
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00289.html (11,308 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:02:16 -0500
"Shelby, I am absolutely shocked and disgusted that you would even consider an action of this nature for a contest sponsored by NCJ. NCJ has always been about extending the capabilities of both the s
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00293.html (9,253 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:20:35 -0700
Howdy all I have seen this picture time and again. Who actually owns this station. I always thought it was kind of a tounge in cheek SO2R picture. I'm sure that this doesn't belong to 'joe ham'. Need
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00296.html (9,189 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Bromley" <jayw5jay@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:21:28 -0500
HI Rick, Shelby, and others, Well it maybe the thread has voiced a heavy bias to separate entry classes, but I am not sure about the masses. I am sure time will tell. I have seen this thread blow up
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00297.html (15,237 bytes)

9. [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Montemerlo" <montemerlo@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:43:14 -0400
Hi Shelby and all, God I don't believe that I am going to say this but here it goes.... As a newbie in RTTY Contesting I am a huge support of restricted classes: Rookie, Wires, SO1R, Braindead, you n
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00298.html (8,812 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: k2qmf@juno.com
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:06:35 -0400
Why can't we all just be friends... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00304.html (9,763 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:48:15 -0500
So how does adding SO1R make this any better for the 22k op? 22k might be that op's best ever effort, and they might be quite proud of their score, all things considered. 73 de Billy, AA4NU ________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00306.html (8,650 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:02:27 -0400
-- Original Message -- This is what is -really- sad. The above was received in a private mail from someone that aspires to be better at RTTY contesting, but is being turned off by the nature of the d
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00308.html (10,008 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:17:32 -0400
John Fleming wrote: " How many others of the silent majority are feeling the same?" John...there is no such thing as a "silent" majority! There is possibly a "silent" minority? How will anyone else k
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00311.html (10,101 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:16:57 -0400
John, IMHO, what is *REALLY* sad is that the author of the letter you quote above considers that people stating (and discussing) their heartfelt, honest opinion is "whining"... "Forget open debate, M
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00312.html (10,288 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:39:22 -0400
John You can count me as one that enjoys contesting, but not the dialog in what really is "change the rules so I can (a)Make my score look better, or (B)Win with out having to work harder, faster, sm
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00314.html (10,569 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:40:46 -0400
I think the main problem is that the discussion has been had sooo many times over several years. Nothing changes - The arguments are the same every year. There are probably some reflector trolls that
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00315.html (11,189 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:54:21 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- "Exile SO2R"? Where did that come from? SO2R stations can operate as they always have. What's wanted is a separate class for SO1R. Bill, W6WRT ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00318.html (9,751 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:00:40 -0700
King George III whining about those pesky colonists. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00319.html (10,017 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:01:49 +0000
I for one am completely turned off by this constant exchange. I am sick and tired of hearing this year after year, and I am running out of filters to delete this garbage. Just how long do you plan o
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00321.html (9,897 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:25:14 -0400
Whether you make a separate category for SO1R or for SO2R the effect is the same. A "SO1R only" category would have the effect of placing any operator who used SO2R is a separate. smaller category. T
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00327.html (10,421 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu