Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+An\s+open\s+letter\s+to\s+Shelby\,\s+K4WW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+An\s+open\s+letter\s+to\s+Shelby\,\s+K4WW\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:46:03 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I have sat here for several minutes trying to think of an adequate reply to the above nonsense. Can't do it. Bill, W6WRT ______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00332.html (9,990 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:56:36 -0400; I absolutely agree it's been going on for years. But that tells me that where there's smoke, there may be fire; which is to say, it seems to still be an active, valid, unresolved issue, not "whining"; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00335.html (9,618 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "ws7i" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:38:10 -0700; Hmmm, I think that would make SOMR just like M/M. One is a small class, and the other quite a bit larger. Never did mind winning either, personnally. Then they added M2 because its hard to build a re; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00365.html (11,087 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "ws7i" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:56:57 -0700; Robert, Some good points and welcome to the world of RTTY contesting, sounds like you're enjoying it. Just a small point, its not Shelby's contest, the NAQP, is your contest and mine. Shelby is only; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00367.html (9,808 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "Jack West" <w7ld@theriver.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:06:52 -0700; Hi All, I have been reading and reading the contest rule discussion and NOW I have to say something. I was introduced to RTTY contesting while on a business trip to New Hampshire by Bob,W1UBG (SK). W; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00369.html (11,643 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:28:32 +0000; Comments interspersed below... The reason I'm against the rule change, and I'm sure others agree, is I built my station to be as competitive as can be *within the context of the rules*. Now, that I'v; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00382.html (11,091 bytes)
27. [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:19:29 -0400; I'm not the one that initiated this discussion, but readily admit my own "personal" feelings, about it! Believe it or not, I have kept each and every one of the posts, and, as contest manager for NAQ; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00399.html (8,553 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:44:36 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Yep. Grandpa loved his 1932 Oldsmobile and then they built those damn freeways! What were they thinking of? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00417.html (8,998 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]