Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Answering\s+CQ\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Answering\s+CQ\'s\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:09:13 -0700; OK, what is the consensus on answering CQ's? Do we: 1. Put the guys call in first, then our call twice? 2. Don't put the other guys call in at all and just send our call? In the CQWW RTTY test I had; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00013.html (8,146 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:28:09 -0400; works most all the time. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _____________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00014.html (8,088 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:34:01 -0700; pile, I can tell you it is very frustrating to get: HC8N DE POIQWUEDNCOQIUWSQPOIDJXPQOJDPOQKSQ Just send your call, and maybe one DE - give me chance to copy YOUR characters - I already know who I am; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00015.html (9,782 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:41:52 -0400; Hi Tom Today most RTTY op's are on freq. (A few still dont underswtqnd AFC and NET with AFSK, or realize AFC on MMTTY changes where they tune even if they use FSK. Given the above statement, and cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00017.html (9,365 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: "Ekki Plicht (DF4OR)" <ep@plicht.de>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:45:08 +0200; Our pile ups in HB0 haven't certainly been as bad as Jeffs, but still... #2 is mucho better. I know _my_ callsign very well. I want to know his or hers... 73, Ekki, DF4OR (as member of HB0/DL1ZBO thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00018.html (8,244 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:01:10 -0500; Both..... I have two S&P macros and if the band is not all that cluttered I use #2 mycall two times with no DE or trailing K. This works most of the time and is my default. If conditions are not all; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00019.html (7,950 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:03:47 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I should point out that putting your call first is not for you, it's so other stations on frequency will know who is being called. It happens often that two stat; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00020.html (8,820 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:15:56 +0000; In addition to a macro with only his call in it, you could set one macro with your call only one time. (Use spaces at start and end of all macros.) Then use these two in combination as necessary - an; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00022.html (7,719 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Graham Ridgeway <m5aav@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:09:53 +0000; Beacuse I use low power I still use a 2 x 3 response - It works - probably because my 'extended' response is still running and visible after everybody elses short call has ended. That is also why, s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00039.html (8,843 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: DieselCar@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:14:09 EDT; Hi Bill, While RTTY Contesting, I am S & P about 95% of the time. I use #2. However, as someone has mentioned, there is times when two stations on the same frequency calling CQ. If one or both is nee; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00041.html (7,349 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:27:50 +0100; Hello Tom and the group............ I think the simple answer is to use No2! There are a couple of instances where No1 should be used: 1.....When there is more than one station on a frequency, and yo; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00042.html (11,106 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:53:16 -0700; Agree with everything Phil said... it's a real rate bummer to sit and watch your call repeated three times and his call six times. (My fave this contest was the guy who sent my call 3 times and his c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00044.html (9,934 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:12:15 -0700; Ditto for me. And wonder how many caught the advanced contest "PhD suggestion" in Phil's posting? It is the same one that Don AA5AU mentions one time [hint] on his contesting website. I use it regula; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00045.html (11,189 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Graham Ridgeway <m5aav@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:10:05 +0000; Can I say a BIG Thankyou to everyone who has posted on this one so far. Although I have been licenced for 26 years, I am a relative newcomer to RTTY - certainly in contesting, and accept that I am st; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00047.html (8,372 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Answering CQ's (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:14:41 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I've done probably 100 or more RTTY contests in the last ten years and I'm still learning too. There is hardly a contest where I don't tweak at least one macro.; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00086.html (8,515 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]