Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Any\s+EQSL\s+is\s+invalid\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Any\s+EQSL\s+is\s+invalid\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:33:59 -0800; The only QSL card I received (many years ago) from a "pirate" was from Amy ZK1AT. Later found out that the call sign was never licensed by the authorities. She ran the harbor radio in North Cook, so; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00046.html (7,233 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:16:25 -0800 (PST); <Once upon a time it was assumed that submissions were made in good faith. Fraud was always known to exist; however, it was considered such a small fraction as to be inconsequential. Today you are co; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00047.html (6,849 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:10:11 -0500; Unfortunately there were too many instances of 17 meter cards being modified and submitted as 160 Meter cards. The Awards Committee remains unconvinced that the field checkers have the ability to de; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00048.html (8,328 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid (score: 1): Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:52:04 -0500; I have ARRL LOTW DXCC/WAS and eQSL DXCC/WAS and I value both equally. I have been with eQSL since it's inception and have NEVER experienced any attempted cheating from other hams. However I have expe; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00050.html (6,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]