Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Anyone\s+Have\s+a\s+DXP38\s+For\s+Sale\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: Doug McDuff <w4ox@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:32:20 +0000
Hi to All, I am in need of a replacement DXP38 as mine was taken out by a recent lightning strike and likely beyond repair. Please email me directly with the details if you have one you are willing t
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00136.html (6,476 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul N. Gayet AA1SU" <AA1SU@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:51:51 -0400
Hello Doug W4OX, Gary W5FI, (et al), I currently have a HAL DXP38 up for auction on eBay. It is not doing very well at the moment. This is probably due to an embarrassing spelling error that I made i
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00143.html (8,574 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: Dick Flanagan K7VC <dick@k7vc.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:34:50 -0700
This begs an interesting question (interesting to me, anyway): Is there a widely accepted best hardware RTTY decoder? (Computer software and radio left out of the equation for the moment)? Dick -- Di
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00146.html (7,710 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:20:01 -0700
My personal preference was a HAL ST-8000 (not the 8000A). I still own the ST-8000, but have not turned it on for at least a half dozen years now. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00147.html (7,592 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:50:15 -0700
Hi dick This is probably like asking, "Which is better, a Ford or Chevy" :-) I think the best hardware TU that was ever built was the ST-6. I used the ST-5 and ST-6 and the '6 used to copy stuff I co
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00148.html (7,530 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:40:27 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: The best hardware decoder I ever used personally was the HAL ST-8000. I have also used the DXP-38, the KAM (not the pro version) and the AEA DSP-232. I ran them all side by s
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00150.html (8,497 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:05:39 -0400
Which profile did you use when testing MMTTY, Bill? 73, Dave, AA6YQ ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: The best hardware decoder I ever used personally was the HAL ST-8000. I have also used the DXP-38, the KAM
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00151.html (9,138 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:39:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I used the default profile. I was (and am) most interested in decoding signals right at the noise level and partly covered with QRM and QRN, as opposed to stronger signals wh
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00153.html (7,956 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:42:47 -0700
Guess I have used most hardware Terminal Units at one time or the other. Flesher Tu-170, Tu-470, AEA CP-1, CP-100, ATU-1000, PK-232, Kam, Dovetron, and all Hal TU's since ST-5. Reviewed hardware for
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00155.html (9,980 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Anyone Have a DXP38 For Sale? (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:32:46 -0700
To decode weak signals under good band conditions, a good matched filter should help when there is no QRM within 500 Hz or so of both Mark and Space tones. Open up any filter that is ahead of the mat
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00157.html (11,339 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu