Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+Sprint\s+2013\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+Sprint\s+2013\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <roger@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:36:53 +0000; Hi. Just to bring your attention to the upcoming BARTG Sprint Contest 2013 BARTG RTTY SPRINT 2013 TIME / DATE: 1200 GMT Saturday January 26th to 1200 GMT Sunday January 27th 2013. BANDS: 80, 40, 20,; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00026.html (8,382 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ed <autek@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:29:44 -0500; Full rules can be found on the BARTG web site here: When will BARTG revamp their archaic rules for US call areas. Ed W3NR _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00031.html (7,282 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:02:36 -0500; It's not archaic, it's logical. Canada, Australia and the U.S. are large countries, so part of the challenge of working all call districts means that you managed to hit all corners of a country the s; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00033.html (9,209 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 22:36:56 -0600; Ken, The FCC used to require a new callsign when changing districts, but the rule changed at some point, probably due to our more mobile society. The FCC WILL issue a W7 call to someone in NY. You ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00034.html (8,790 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:16:12 -0900; A more appropriate question would be when will the FCC revise their "archaic" bureaucratic polices that created this unmitigated mess in the first place? What is the point in having 10 different call; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00035.html (11,055 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 07:50:03 -0500; Gary, Ken, you have said it all. The rules work for the rest of the world ... it's the mess with calls in the US that is raising this question. Something more important is the difficulty in assessing; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00036.html (12,904 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:27:06 -0600; Being a 7 in the US Midwest, I understand that a DX station can be confused about propagation because he assumes I'm in the West. Some spotting programs provide the state of the spotter. VE7CC's CC U; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00038.html (8,357 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <roger@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:43:02 +0000; HI Guys. Itotally agree with John. The US messed up the call area situation and should have left it alone. I do see your point about changing calls when you change areas, but there should have been p; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00039.html (13,955 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:14:46 -0800; REPLY: What would you like to see instead? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00053.html (8,118 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:19:31 -0800; REPLY: It baffles me why the FCC bothers with call districts at all. At one time before the advent of computers and instant data transfer I suppose it made sense but those days are long gone. Bill, W; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00054.html (8,342 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:16 -0800 (PST); ORIGINAL REPLY: It baffles me why the FCC bothers with call districts at all. At one time before the advent of computers and instant data transfer I suppose it made sense but those days are long gone; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00055.html (9,443 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:53:48 -0800; REPLY: Please be more specific. How would you do it? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtt; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00056.html (8,268 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:46:57 -0800 (PST); Simple. Stick with what you had. You report any moves to another call district, just like you do with your drivers license when you move to a new state, right? The FCC issues you with a call for th; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00060.html (10,013 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:55:47 +0000; I remember way back a cq 160 contest administrator INSISTED that if you were in a different call area, that you HAD to sign your call/what ever district.. that would make a simple solution other than; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00061.html (10,429 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:18:43 -0800; In the US, the Department of Motor Vehicles is a state-level agency, while the FCC operates at the federal level. The FCC doesn't (and shouldn't) care about the intricacies of multipliers in contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00063.html (11,083 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:06:41 -0800 (PST); Thanks Iain, Point taken. However, it adds strength to BARTG's argument for the additional identification by U.S. hams in their contest. 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS ________________________________ Fro; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00068.html (11,890 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:57:49 -0800; One thing I've always wondered about is the designator in Europe of /p. If someone sends SM8XXX/p, does that mean they are portable in SM, or somewhere else. Thanks and 73 Tom W7WHY Gary, Ken, you ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00075.html (9,709 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:18:06 -0800; I love my 'WHY' call. Why would I want to move to California and end up with KA6XLQ or some other call that don't mean squat to me. Lot's of people have their state for suffix, or their intials, or n; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00077.html (9,669 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:31:04 -0800; REPLY: Apples and oranges. In the USA, different states have different rules of the road. In wide open Montana speed limits may be quite different from a more congested eastern state. Having a driver; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00078.html (9,541 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013 (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:14:44 -0500; Geez Bill, where are you getting this from? I was pretty careful to keep my discussion about moving from one call district to another. Nobody suggested 50 call districts or thousands based on countie; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-01/msg00081.html (11,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]