Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQ\s+RTTY\s+160\s+WAS\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 21:43:29 -0400
1.808 now -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D WAS RTTY #455 from NY(all via LoTW) WAS RTTY #549 from MA (all via LoTW) DXCC RTTY #1,832 (all via LoTW) WAZ RTTY #184 -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - W
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00048.html (7,008 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Danilo Brelih <danilo.brelih@siol.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 14:36:08 +0200
Andrei Stchislenok pravi: Please guys open a new e-list at yahoogroups or gmailgroups or try to use dx network for posting real time CQ ! Posts like this are useless for rest of the world reading RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00052.html (6,853 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:44:23 -0500
I agree with Dan S50U and there is nothing wrong with SWL cluster spots for 160. Let's use the cluster for 160 spots. Try sh/dx/10 160 73 Dick AA5VU _______________________________________________ RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00053.html (7,486 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Danilo Brelih <danilo.brelih@siol.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:49:57 +0200
James Douglass pravi: I know "THE BAND" well. Few years ago I finished WAS on CW from here! As sysop of S50CLX Spider DXCluster my suggestion would be using CHAT command with help bellow for Spider c
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00054.html (9,015 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: "Jack West XP" <w7ld@theriver.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 09:05:17 -0700
Dan, So sorry to offend you with my post. The DX Cluster is unavailable to me here at this QTH as only a very slow dial-up ISP is available. I live too far in the tulies to connect to a DXcluster via
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00055.html (8,734 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:17:52 -0400
At first, I thought it odd that we were using the list in this way, but I have come to appreciate it as an evening reminder that RTTY is active there. I actually got on the other evening and worked w
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00056.html (9,940 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Ed Steeble <esteeble@sc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:35:19 -0400
Please use the DX command to say who you worked or saw on 160m RTTY. I don't monitor the Announce commands. The DX command format is DX frequency callsign comments the comments are optional but shoul
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00057.html (10,179 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:14:23 -0500
QSL but for those of us that receive posting in less than real time (via digest) the cluster is a good alternative for spots of 160 RTTY activity. I remember a year or so ago working a guy in FL on 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00058.html (7,930 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 18:15:47 -0700
I disagree. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00059.html (8,084 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] CQ RTTY 160 WAS (score: 1)
Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 21:46:04 -0400
I also disagree. Its motivated me to get something that radiates up on 160. If we were getting 100s of emails a day it would be one thing but with the volume of this list, its great! Neal k3nc -- Nea
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-05/msg00060.html (9,051 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu