Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Canadian\s+multipliers\s+in\s+CQ\s+WW\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Canadian\s+multipliers\s+in\s+CQ\s+WW\s+RTTY\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Canadian multipliers in CQ WW RTTY (score: 1): Author: ve3iay@rac.ca (Richard Ferch); Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 15:43:55 -0400; correct Obviously I cannot tell you what will be acceptable to the rules committee, but I can offer a suggestion as to why Canadian hams send their exchanges the way they do, and I can also make a su; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00350.html (9,514 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Canadian multipliers in CQ WW RTTY (score: 1): Author: vk4cej@hamsnet.net (John); Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 08:49:29 +1000; Hello Richard.. thankyou for your reply.. I agree with you 100 percent. the rules are far too ambiguous and need cleaning up. My message was in no way intended as a slur on any of the Canadian statio; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-09/msg00354.html (11,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]