Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Cheating\s+\-\s+\(No\s+Scratch\s+that\s+make\s+it\s+\-\s+\"Whining\"\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Ron K5DJ" <k5dj@austin.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:40:21 -0500
Hi All, it's been a while since I check in.. I really haven't laid my hand of a radio since CQWW RTTY 2002 Contest. However, I do check the RTTY reflector from time to time and it seem like it's the
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00283.html (12,827 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:57:40 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Ron, you are new to the thread, obviously. First, SO2R is not "over my head". I operated SO2R in five of six contests back in the '90s, decided it was not for me and that was
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00295.html (10,631 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:45:44 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Ron, you are a fine one to talk about SO2R being over someone's head. You were one of the original SO2R frequency hogs that gave the mode a bad reputation with a lot of folks
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00298.html (10,182 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:01:16 -0600
I guess badgering and being obnoxious is not only limited to post made by W4TV. If all hams had your attitude Ham Radio would have died before it started. And I thought we were ambassadors of goodwil
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00299.html (11,450 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:16:50 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: What attitude is that, Mike? Calling for fairness? A level playing field for contesters? Freedom of speech on the reflector? Demanding facts, not BS? Which of these is killin
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00306.html (10,281 bytes)

6. [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:46:30 -0700
I think these arguments should be settled out in the parking lot :-) Or at least with posts to eachother off the list. Usually, if I really dissagree with someone, I take it up with private emails. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00307.html (10,478 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:36:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Normally I agree, but if someone posts something in public that really needs to be refuted, what good does it do to refute in private? 73, Bill W6WRT ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00310.html (10,463 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Cheating - (No Scratch that make it - "Whining") (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:01:00 -0400
Mike, My replies to Bill were only in response to his whinny "I don't want to have to compete against 'their kind'" nonsense. Like SO2R or not, use SO2R or not, operators who use SO2R are just as muc
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00313.html (11,449 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu