- 21. Re: [RTTY] Comments on TX5C RTTY Operations (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:55:36 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Amen to that, but again... that is a favorite technique of jammers. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00110.html (8,853 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RTTY] Comments on TX5C RTTY Operations (score: 1)
- Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:26:10 -0400
- Hi Nelson, I made a similar mistake. I had been calling split and decided to do some longer listening, rather than just using the momentary REV button like I usually do to find where he was working,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00111.html (11,968 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RTTY] Comments on TX5C RTTY Operations (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:04:34 -0700
- Hi Mike Best thing to do is SHUT UP!! If they are trying to jam TX5C, telling them "up" or "lid" or "**hole" just feeds their ego and makes them do it more. Ignoring them makes them feel bad and they
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00118.html (10,155 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu