- 1. [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger Cooke" <rcooke@g3ldi.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:34:14 -0000
- Hi. The poor propagation in the BARTG Sprint contest presented some difficulties with exchanges. I realise that the ubiquitous use of 599 is now more or less accepted, but I was quite pleased in one
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00283.html (8,070 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:58:54 +0000
- Hi Roger, The BARTG Sprint requires no RST at all. The exchange is only serial numbers. Most of the stations I worked did not include a signal report. I guess the BARTG is one organization that reali
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00284.html (10,264 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:11:21 -0600 (CST)
- BARTG Sprint rules say "serial number only". That's all I sent (along with callsigns as appropriate, of course). I agree - drop the RST. Better, add something else. We already have tests that want Ma
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00285.html (8,137 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:06:46 -0700
- -- Original Message -- From: "Roger Cooke" <rcooke@g3ldi.freeserve.co.uk> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? Hi. The poor propagati
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00286.html (8,270 bytes)
- 5. RE: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob VanFossen" <k4djg@shentel.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:12:58 -0500
- Just goes to show that there are still Gentlemen AND LIDs out there. Bob K4DJG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00287.html (7,557 bytes)
- 6. RE: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Inbody (AD0K)" <ad0k@inbody.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:15:56 -0600
- Very good comments. Now I am a raw rookie at this contest thing, but have been operating for over a quarter of a century. I agree with the 599 remark and would enjoy something else. The QSL or TU is
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00288.html (10,281 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:35:59 +0000
- RST is not required in the BARTG Sprint. You must be somehow using WL differently than I am. My WriteLog module does not send it automatically - in fact, my exchange is set entirely within my memory
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00289.html (10,577 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "llindblom@juno.com" <llindblom@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:59:19 GMT
- I'm not in front of the computer that has WriteLog installed but I know I've changed the predefined 599 received RST to something else when someone sends something different. To my memory once you hi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00290.html (10,171 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:14:54 -0000
- Using Writelog you can log any rst received. You can also configure it so you can send any rst you wish too. Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F I've changed the predefined 599 received RST to something else when someo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00295.html (11,536 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:16:07 +0000
- TU, is I would say that none of that stations qsos were valid without an ACK. There are various definitions around about what constitutes a qso but I always tend to gravitate back to my VHF meteor s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00297.html (9,467 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu