Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Contest\s+QRMing\s+of\s+other\s+digimodes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Contest\s+QRMing\s+of\s+other\s+digimodes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1): Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:17:11 -0500; I support Ed's statement regarding LID comments from v145/19. In regard to qrm to other digital modes during contests: During over 25 years of RTTY contesting, I have never seen the rtty sub-bands wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00136.html (7,467 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:23:43 -0600; I only have a 10 m dipole up right now (and a WARC trap dipole that I probably could have loaded ..) so I was only on that band. Cabrillo rounds your frequency so there is, in reality, more variation; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00137.html (8,734 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 20:42:50 -0500; Just for grins I looked and the highest logged CW contest QSO I have is 28.189 (many above .100). I have about 2000 QSOs on 10M CW above 28.070 (over several years). A similar number on 20 and 15. I; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00147.html (10,966 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Contest QRMing of other digimodes (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:27:56 -0500; This information is retrievable, one call at a time, from the Spots Analysis Tool on the RBN web site. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reverseb; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00152.html (8,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]