Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Courtesy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Courtesy\s*$/: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Andreas Rehberg" <arehberg@gmx.de>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:36:09 +0200 (CEST); Good point Bill, Think I'll change it to version 1. This time I used TU XX1XX DF4WC QRZ in memory of ZC4LI (thought this was the way he confirmed, unfortunately I'm not sure, though having 14; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00011.html (8,878 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:30:30 -0500; I had a very similar thing happen more than once, The would call and give the report all in one motion, my response would be to give their call the report and TU message all in one, and in some cases; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00012.html (10,443 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:29:14 -0700; HI Dave I also think the 'TU' is the same as saying 'I got it all thanks' and moving on. What I don't understand is the ones who send 'W7WHY TU DE XX8XX QRZ' over and over as their F3 message. Especi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00013.html (8,684 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <roger@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:40:15 +0000; Just to add my two pennies in to this discussion. How about making the sending of the name, TU, and greetings ( GA, GE or whatever) a mandatory thing? If everybody HAD to send those, RTTY would be se; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00024.html (11,614 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:48:27 +0000; I really enjoy several North American contests (ARRL Sweepstakes; NAQP; NA Sprint) that take at least one of these steps by including the name. Sweepstakes and NA Sprint in particular, also require s; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00025.html (8,544 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:03:49 -0400; I ALWAYS include a TU in my exchange. Although it's mostly abt confirming a contact, I have no problem with it also being friendly and polite. I find it somewhat offensive in a 'big brother' sort of; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00026.html (9,468 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:44:58 -0700; How about making the sending of the name, TU, and greetings ( GA, GE or There is NOTHING I hate more than people who doesn't know me from Adam, greeting me in a contest as Henry. Obviously, they don'; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00028.html (8,386 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:08:23 -0700; I know what you mean Hank. It grits me when someone sends 'Hi Thomas.' I never use that name. 73 Tom W7WHY There is NOTHING I hate more than people who doesn't know me from Adam, greeting me in a con; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00060.html (8,494 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:40:44 +0000; There is NOTHING I hate more than people who doesn't know me from Adam, greeting me in a contest as Henry. Obviously, they don't know me because the only one who ever called me Henry was my mother an; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00068.html (8,916 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "W4GKM" <w4gkm@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:54:43 -0500; I go by Nick, but you can call me Nicholas or anything else, just as long as you call me. I appreciate all contacts. try "clyde",,, I go by john w8wej On 10/3/2013 02:08, Tom Osborne wrote: I know wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00069.html (9,424 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:29:11 -0400; I had one particularly warm and friendly contact where to station sent 'HI STEVE C BOOKOUT...'. No doubt a close friend. He was trying. I laughed and went on. 73 de Steve, NR4M ______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00070.html (10,840 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Tom Magarelli" <wa2pni@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:47:21 -0400; Following this courtesy on RTTY discussion line. I had the thought, would it be to much time and data not to only send TU but add GL to the courtesy response so it could be TU GL Just a thought. Woul; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00071.html (10,747 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:53:37 -0400; Monitor the PROs and do as they do. 73, Claude VE2FK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00072.html (8,107 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:55:17 -0400; Hi John, "clyde" is 'interesting' in Morse, and it has the dreaded "de" that causes so much heartburn for RTTY contesters! 73, Kazimierz, KE4PT [ I go by "Kai"] On 10/3/2013 8:40 AM, john wrote: try; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00073.html (9,505 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:24:51 +0000; in all these yrs Ive no thought of that, of course I never use clyde either thanks for the insight 73 john On 10/3/2013 13:55, Kai wrote: Hi John, "clyde" is 'interesting' in Morse, and it has the dr; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00074.html (10,508 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:26:13 -0500; The format for the best exchange is pretty well fine-tuned. And as with the /QRP, the more stuff you put on the line, the more unproductive it is. GL is another example of that. The direct cost is in; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00078.html (13,341 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <rabisch@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:09:44 -0400; Not being a heavy duty contester but enjoying a contest now and then I find this discussion of Courtesy during a contest to possibly be an oxymoron. Have you ever heard a contester be courteous to a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00080.html (9,495 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:22:45 -0500; Jeff, I understand and agree with your assessment of overall contest exchange efficiency. I smile at the "GL" that is often included in the exchange. Fortunately, I am *not* counting on "Luck", wheth; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00081.html (16,238 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Jurgen Geldhof <list@on5mf.be>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:34:46 +0200; Hi, just my view as a small pistol contester: If that P5 multiplier works me I don't care if he sends me his name and qth and even te name of his grand mother and the make of his computer. For all te; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00082.html (17,599 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1): Author: Ed <autek@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:40:31 -0400; On 10/03/2013 12:26 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: The format for the best exchange is pretty well fine-tuned. And as with the /QRP, the more stuff you put on the line, the more unproductive it is. GL is ano; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00086.html (10,308 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]