- 41. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:26:55 -0400
- Bob, 'I find this discussion of Courtesy during a contest to Blanket statements are difficult to defend because they are usually 'absolutes'. Just so happened that this past weekend... My quote: Gran
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00092.html (11,011 bytes)
- 42. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:27:54 -0400
- Hi Bob Most folks know what to give/get in a contest, and I en devour to keep things moving along. Sometimes - not always - you can pick out the non-contesters. Not sure what you are looking for as f
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00098.html (10,822 bytes)
- 43. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Magarelli" <wa2pni@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:20:33 -0400
- I would like to thank you all for your input and comments. It was just a thought I had, that's why I asked. If I don't ask questions then I don't learn. Thanks to the group for being informational. T
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00099.html (11,242 bytes)
- 44. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:30:08 -0500
- The fact is that to do well, a serious contest effort needs to get maximal efficiency out of the time spent. This is in addition the prior investments in gear and antennas, getting things debugged an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00105.html (11,083 bytes)
- 45. Re: [RTTY] Courtesy (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:19:42 -0700
- I agree, Jeff. Applying the definition of "courteous" in a rag-chewing environment is inappropriate in a contesting environment. Contesters are not discourteous because they pursue the contest object
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00108.html (13,002 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu