- 1. [RTTY] Credit for P5 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense" <sentek@sprintmail.com (Floyd Sense)
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:18:51 -0400
- Just got my P5 QSL card today for a recent RTTY contact, only to read in a magazine a couple of hours later that the ARRL is not approving RTTY contacts with P5/4L4FN for DXCC credit. Is that true, a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00019.html (6,942 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] Credit for P5 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:14:45 -0500
- This true. Only SSB contacts are valid for DXCC. I don't think there has been any definitive reasons given why only SSB contacts are valid other than what was released by the ARRL as follows: "Since
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00020.html (8,773 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] Credit for P5 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: k7wm@i10net.com (k7wm)
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 20:16:29 -0000
- Don, I agree 100% with what the ARRL DXCC rules state. However, there is no mention of approval required of each amateur mode. As it reads, rule 7, "Any Amateur Radio operation, etc., etc.,". This ha
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00025.html (10,290 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] Credit for P5 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: w1ksz@arrl.net (Richard W. Solomon)
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 20:47:25 -0400
- I believe the story given on the 9U was that they did not want to endanger anyone there by publishing stories that they were not properly licensed. At least thats what I read. 73, Dick, W1KSZ --Origi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00026.html (10,919 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] Credit for P5 RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: bernie@dailydx.com (Bernie McClenny)
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
- My understanding is that the paper work that was submitted only mentioned SSB. It's a long story but I really beleif eventually all QSOs will count for DXCC. Ed needs to come up with something that s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00038.html (11,775 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu