Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Debate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Debate\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] debate (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:01:18 -0500; Hey, maybe we really don't need SO1R and SO2R classes or Limited, Unlimited. What we need are: MWSKTAT (my wife said NO to a tower) MVS50FM (my village said 50 feet max) and ILITCAGA (i live in the c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00287.html (7,399 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] debate (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:33:58 -0500; Rats, I hate it when I proofread and still miss a typo! I fixed in this version. I'm using the excuse that my typing field wasn't level and that's what made my typing score so poor! _________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00288.html (8,123 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] debate (score: 1): Author: "NW7US, Tomas" <nw7us@hfradio.org>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:45:35 -0700; I am one-handed - just had my second surgery, this one on my left wrist, for carpel tunnel release. My right hand was done about two months ago. I am still recovering from that as I have about a 50lb; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00290.html (8,463 bytes)
4. [RTTY] debate (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:10:32 -0500; still don't really care about no stinkun classes. And this analogy may be poor. But back when I was in the construction business, I developed a way to produce the same results as my competitors, at a; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00309.html (7,778 bytes)
5. [RTTY] debate (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:14:31 -0500; For the most part...I don't call this bickering. Differences in opinions....absolutely. I've heard good arguments on both sides. I still would like to know...how many SOmR ops there are, who are part; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00355.html (7,581 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: N6OJ <n6oj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:00:27 -0700; Hi Guys SORRY I RESTARTED THIS TOPIC All I wanted to do was create a class that the average guy could maybe get a piece of paper or a chance to get even an arrl section placement to keep him interest; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00377.html (7,316 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "Robert Jonsson" <tf3tty@internet.is>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:50:24 -0000; Hi all. Any idea of some automatic stuff or program to delete those ugly garbage e-mail I am getting! 73 de tf3tty Hi Guys SORRY I RESTARTED THIS TOPIC All I wanted to do was create a class that the; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00384.html (8,188 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:35:33 -0400; Chuck, Absolutely NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE! We should welcome other views and not be afraid to exercise our right of free speech. Der Fuhrer is not running this country (yet). (Besides, whether they were; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00387.html (8,276 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "Alan Realey" <wb2jep@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:46:59 -0400; The "delete" key works just fine for me. I seem to be wearing it out these days! Peace to all... Hi all. Any idea of some automatic stuff or program to delete those ugly garbage e-mail I am getting!; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00391.html (8,934 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "Dallmeier, Walter" <walter@dallmeier.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:54:08 +0200; Hi Robert, A defined rule in my outlook is working fine here, it move it direct into the waste. 73 de Walter, DL4RCK, DL4R Walter Dallmeier Email: mailto:walter@dallmeier.com http://www.dallmeier.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00392.html (10,597 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:55:20 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'm glad Geo. Washington had a somewhat different attitude. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00421.html (7,708 bytes)
12. [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:29:35 -0800; Nah, let's debate again its been a while. Using your logic a Multi operator is a Multi yet there are M/S, M2, MM we should just have one ....right ? _______________________________________________ RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00335.html (9,629 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: w1hkj <w1hkj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:57:18 -0600; I'm new to this group, but not new to amateur radio ... been licensed continuously for 55 years. I find the discussion trail quite humorous, so perhaps a bit of tongue in cheek humor is in order. Why; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00336.html (11,358 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:11:14 -0800; Excellent! But you did miss one: Pilgrim Travels to operate at another ham's super station. May or may not clean up his own messes. Carry on! - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oa; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00340.html (12,634 bytes)
15. [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:17:20 -0800; Least anyone mistake my humor of earlier this morning. I have now and always will support changes in RTTY contesting. Heck I have been doing this so long that my keyboard has grey keys. Technology is; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00341.html (7,018 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:13:14 -0800; Hi Jay I've always heard that 'You should do the best with what you got', and 'Contesting is supposed to be fun.' The reason I do these contests is for the fun, and I'll never finish anywhere near th; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00342.html (9,038 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Greg Rauch <ki6ck@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:40:02 -0800 (PST); IMHO.... SOmR operators are like "olympians".. really amazing stuff. I'm content with my single radio/amp setup, and do enjoy some really good runs on occasion. Maybe someday contest sponsors wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00357.html (10,482 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <johnn1jm@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:20:23 -0700; Some contests do have an expert category. John N1JM -- sent on my MacbookPro _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00359.html (11,280 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:06:48 -0800; Indeed. However, taking the BARTG Sprint Expert Class as an example, the burden of following the rule is actually on the non-Expert. Experts can change bands at will but regular SOAB "...may only cha; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00370.html (9,445 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Debate (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:56:12 -0500; The BARTG Expert rules were intended to 'burden' the minority of SOAB stations running SO2R. It simply puts them all together in a class with an 'expert' label. This leaves the SO1R majority (the 'ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00373.html (10,114 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]