Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Digital\s+Operators\s+Band\s+Plan\s+Committee\s+\-\s+Current\s+thoughts\s+and\s+status\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:16:27 -0500
Hi Mark and all, We assembled a good committee of well qualified folks. There are several key points that were agreed on but when it came down to a actual band plan that's just tough to do over email
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00313.html (15,858 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:39:31 -0400
In the Mon Dieux department, D-STAR users hold regularly scheduled D-STAR nets in the phone portions of the HF bands. Just look for the 6 kHz wide signals, or see http://www.dstarinfo.com/DSTARHFNet.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00315.html (16,902 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: "Don W5FKX" <w5fkx@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:56:21 -0500
With my apologies for any inaccuracies in my recommendations, given the lack of any leadership from ARRL, here is my final submission of comments to the Band Planning Committee: My displeasure with t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00319.html (9,170 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 11:03:54 -0500
You're confusing two things here, software development and communications protocols. It's perfectly acceptable in my view for a software author to release only a binary of his work and not the source
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00026.html (9,363 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:17:45 -0700
I agree with Peter. Personally, I prefer proper engineering documentation of the protocol than just be given open sourced code. Open sourcing allows you to copy the code at will (up to the restrictio
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00030.html (9,151 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu