Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+E\-mail\s+from\s+VU4\s+Dxped\s+re\s+PSK31\s+for\s+NA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+E\-mail\s+from\s+VU4\s+Dxped\s+re\s+PSK31\s+for\s+NA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] E-mail from VU4 Dxped re PSK31 for NA (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 06:19:07 -0600; I received an E-mail from Sara, VU3SRB, who confirmed my psk31 QSO. She was at the keys. She also added this info: 1200 UTC... 2500 Channel. So she could be using lower case now. The time window is n; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00118.html (7,027 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] E-mail from VU4 Dxped re PSK31 for NA (score: 1): Author: "Richard W. Solomon" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:08:50 -0500 (GMT-05:00); PSK, SSTV, what next, Hellschriber. What ever happened to good old fashioned RTTY. And don't tell me PSK is better for weak signals, it may be, but SSTV ?? 73, Dick, W1KSZ I received an E-mail from S; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00119.html (8,114 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] E-mail from VU4 Dxped re PSK31 for NA (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:46:54 -0800; On Dec 17, 2004, at 5:08 AM, Richard W. Solomon wrote: And don't tell me PSK is better for weak signals, it may be, but SSTV ?? For weak signal work, when there is no multipath, PSK is not maybe bett; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-12/msg00120.html (8,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]