Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FSK\s+is\s+bad\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FSK\s+is\s+bad\?\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:27:58 -0400; It is mostly a problem with those who pump the output of their sound card directly into the mic jack without an attenuator. Most rigs - particularly those (Kenwood, Yaesu, Ten-Tec) designed for use w; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00349.html (9,371 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:37:06 -0400; thinking they did things right. Unlikely. To the best of my knowledge, the only rig manufacturer who makes a serious attempt to reduce key clicks in FSK is Elecraft (and even then only after K0SM poi; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00351.html (9,775 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:00:35 +0000; You all are throwing so many good ideas around that I am starting to get confused. Unlikely. To the best of my knowledge, the only rig manufacturer who makes a serious attempt to reduce key clicks in; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00353.html (10,622 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <rtty@w7ay.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:02:57 -0700; As far as I know, you are not wrong, Rich. Flex Radio has an opportunity to do much better, seeing their transmitter is a real DUC (digital up conversion). But I wouldn't count on it ever happening.; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00358.html (9,701 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:11:18 +0200; Yes Bob you right about the note pairs selection with ICOM. But, let me work from memory. Not the 756PROIII nor the 7600 could enable that dreaded TPF - dual audio filters on tone pair - out of the 2; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00360.html (20,176 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:10:21 -0400; How could the PSK and JT people change their bandwidths? It seems to come with the mode. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing lis; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00362.html (9,513 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:26:10 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Simply narrow up the receiver. Mode has nothing to do with it except that they would have to actually tune the VFO instead of just clicking on a signal n; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00363.html (8,140 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad? (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:16:56 -0400; Thom, As I have followed this thread from the beginning, it seems to me that one of your main concerns in FSK vs AFSK is getting the frequency on your dial to be the same as the actual transmitted fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00364.html (9,549 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]