Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FW\:\s+If\s+you\s+care\s+about\s+CW\s+and\s+RTTY\s+\-\s+time\s+is\s+of\s+the\s+essence\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:20:19 +0000
Another area where technology has overtaken regulation. In an all analog world, it makes some sense to regulate transmissions based on content. In a digital world, it does not. There is no syntactic
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00079.html (11,218 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:03:58 +0000
Just to play devil's advocate for the moment... How is it known that the Pactor stations involved are under FCC jurisdiction (97.221(b) is an FCCism), and how is it known that this is not a general D
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00080.html (12,269 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:07:24 -0500
One question for you, how do you tell if a P2-4 station(s) operating outside the auto sub bands is P2P, from a non-domestic source or yet another illegal mailbox? The reason you don't see a lot of th
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00083.html (14,142 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:27:09 +0000
The non-K-land nodes should be identifiable from the Winlink station/frequency lists (and I believe there are some VE and XE stations in the system) For other uses of Pactor...you'd be stuck with the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00088.html (12,171 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:10:38 -0400
Michael, What I'm seeing from some opponents seems to be along the lines of "this rulemaking proposal will eliminate the 97.221 sub-bands and P4/other wideband digital will run roughshod over the exi
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00091.html (14,971 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu