Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FW\:\s+OO\s+Advisory\s+kk5oq\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FW\:\s+OO\s+Advisory\s+kk5oq\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "Anderson, Charles, MSG, 255ACS, SCS, 6820" <Charles.Anderson@msjack.ang.af.mil>; Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:15:06 -0500; Did anyone else notice this? I had a few problems with WL that could of caused this due to hitting incorrect keyboard combinations while trying to go into chat mode during the test. Was unaware WL wo; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00240.html (7,583 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:47:50 -0700; A normal RTTY signal has a shift of 170 Hz, but the -30 dB points are normally about 350 Hz to 450 Hz wide (even wider if you are using an FSK rig that has keyclicks). The mystery deepens since it t; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00245.html (7,712 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "DJ3IW Goetz" <goetzlin@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:03:50 -0000; Hi, I worked Charles, KK5OQ on 16 October, 1615UTC on 15m and I did NOT notice a wide shift. 73 de Goetz, DJ3IW -- Original Message -- From: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com> To: "Anderson, Charles, MSG, 255; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00246.html (8,649 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:41:58 -0400; Hello Chen, Good point about the "keyclicks" from the FSK set-ups. Any ideas on what causes the 'clicks? There were a number of stations that had them in the recent JARTS Contest. 73, Mike, K4GMH ___; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00248.html (8,707 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:33:57 -0700; Ian, G3SEK and I had traded some private email in the past over this. You can view FSK as synchronous OOK (on-off keying - a.k.a. "CW") by two carriers that are spaced by the RTTY shift. When you tra; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00249.html (12,340 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:04:51 -0700; At one time, G3SEK and I checked the schematics very carefully, and had reported to this reflector. My FT-990 is definitely Keyed FSK (i.e., FSK interface, but an internal AFSK generator that feeds a; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00251.html (8,167 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:11:19 -0700; Whoops, that should be "Keyed AFSK," not "Keyed FSK" (which makes no sense :-). 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00252.html (7,465 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: k4sb@bellsouth.net; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 03:09:43 +0000; -- First of all, there is no possible way for a rig running FSK to overdrive or cause "key clicks", assuming of course the rig is not faulty. On the other hand, AFSK can and will and has been overdri; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00255.html (7,986 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <W4TV@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:28:46 -0400; The FT-990, FT-1000D, FT-1000MP, mark V, Field, etc. are actually AFSK even in "FSK." Yaesu generates FSK by feeding an audio tone into the balanced modulator. The audio tone is generated in a phase; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00257.html (8,149 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:32:11 -0400; Joe: Are you sure about the MP series? John N1JM The FT-990, FT-1000D, FT-1000MP, mark V, Field, etc. are actually AFSK even in "FSK." Yaesu generates FSK by feeding an audio tone into the balanced m; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00258.html (7,948 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:24:19 -0700; Those are usually bad AFSK signals. I have been known to futilely answer CQs from a station, only to find him again, usually another 2125 Hz down! :-) If the station is loud and I need it for a mult,; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00262.html (8,723 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "Anderson, Charles, MSG, 255ACS, SCS, 6820" <Charles.Anderson@msjack.ang.af.mil>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:24:57 -0500; Chen, I received another email from Chazz which states it was not the shift he was referring to. Think it was what we called spurs. Any way thanks for the refresher as we use to run the wide shifts i; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00264.html (10,443 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "Andrew J. O'Brien" <obrienaj@netsync.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:16:43 -0400; So are the "spurs" he was referring to simply a overdriven RTTY signal ? Andy K3UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00265.html (8,136 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] FW: OO Advisory kk5oq (score: 1): Author: "robert" <tf3rb@internet.is>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:30:35 -0000; hey gang. It's not the question what we call this all. Spurs, overdriving or whatever we choose. I have been monitoring rtty signals for some time and I see most of the afsk stations in 2 to 3 plases; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00266.html (9,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]