Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Filters\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:19:19 -0600; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:39:21 -0000 From: "David Ashworth" <fathom@Access4Less.net> To: <RTTY@contesting.com> Subject: [RTTY] Inrad filters for rtty question Message-ID: <000f01c41099$3205d420$0401; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00324.html (8,431 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:05:07 -0800; _________________________________________________________ 250 is just right for serious RTTYing. 400 isn't bad, but it's wider than needed for RTTY. 400 would be good for MFSK16, though. -- Bill, W6W; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00326.html (7,293 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "ws7i " <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:14:39 -0800; The most important filter in any radio is that in the 455 IF as far as RTTY goes. Stacking is good. I have always liked 250Hz 455 and 500Hz, with a 500Hz in the 8Mhz IF. Works swell. Some radios only; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00328.html (9,379 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:23:48 GMT; In my Icom 775 I have an INRAD 250 Hz in the 455 KHZ IF and an Icom 330 Hz in the 9MHz IF. I also have 500 HZ Icom filters for both IFs along with the narrow Icom SSB filters. Each seems to have it's; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00333.html (8,191 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:35:17 -0600; Couldn't agree more Jay. I spent about a month and a half this past winter without my Kenwood because it broke down. Sent it in and used an Icom 718, not the greatest radio in the world, but got me b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00340.html (9,132 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:21:24 -0800; _________________________________________________________ When I'm using a 250 Hz filter, quite often when two stations are within 10-20 Hz of each other and nearly the same strength, I can tune off; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00358.html (7,859 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 09:20:50 -0500; At 10:21 AM 3/24/2004, Bill Turner wrote: When I'm using a 250 Hz filter, quite often when two stations are within 10-20 Hz of each other and nearly the same strength, I can tune off to the side and; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00403.html (8,194 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:12:34 -0800; _________________________________________________________ I think it does have to do with bandwidth, in the sense that if you have a very wide filter (500 Hz or more) tuning off to one side will not; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00404.html (8,228 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:47:42 -0800; On Mar 27, 2004, at 7:12 AM, Bill Turner wrote: But you're right about shape being important too. That affects how far off you would tune and how quickly the interfering signal drops off. When two si; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00405.html (8,972 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Ken K7ZUM" <Ken.Knopp@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:00:45 -0800; Chen, I just can't wait to try this out on you !! think the next RTTY test I'll get W7GG or W7EJ and me to gang up on you !! they'll be on one side, I'll be on the other !! HA HA !! 73 de K7ZUM Ken; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00406.html (8,242 bytes)
11. [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Arlon Nelson" <anelson@min.midco.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:25:59 -0500; Hi Anyone out there using the Icom IC-746Pro. How are your three filter positions set for rtty? Are they set soft or sharp? Thanks 73, Nels, WØTUP Minot, North Dakota anelson@min.midco.net - w0tup@ar; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00154.html (6,836 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Jim, KS7S" <wa7sld@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:47:14 -0700; Hi Nels! Are you using AFSK or FSK keying? I assume you are probably using AFSK, based on your question. If you are using FSK (and hence RTTY mode selection), I think you will find the Twin Peak Filt; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00156.html (8,586 bytes)
13. [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: "Arlon Nelson" <anelson@min.midco.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:40 -0500; Thanks to everyone that helped with my filter settings. I'm going to use the twin peak filters. Thanks again. If anyone needs North Dakota for their WAS drop me an email and we can set up a sked. 73,; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00164.html (7,523 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Gert Erik - K5WW <gert.k5ww@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:36:24 -0500; Nels, I could use you on 80 meters, if you want to give it a try. I'd like to set up a sked, if you don't mind. And in case anyone else is reading: I also still need AK, CT, DE, HI, ME, MT, NV, RI an; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00173.html (8,704 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1): Author: Earl <n5zm@adxa.org>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:57:29 -0500; I could also use ND on 80m for LoTW, along with AK, HI and VT. Thanks, Earl N5ZM.. -- -- Earl F. Smith - N5ZM PO Box 20065 White Hall, AR 71612-0065 _______________________________________________ RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00175.html (9,088 bytes)
16. [RTTY] filters (score: 1): Author: Dick-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:44:55 -0600; I have a 500 Hz Inrad filter in my 897D and it works great. I also have a 2KC filter for SSB. Going to 300 Hz will make tuning some stations very difficult. Dick w0raa My memory isn't as good as it u; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00087.html (6,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]