Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+From\:\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+From\:\s+RTTY\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:22:45 -0700; It looks like the change that was discussed yesterday, regarding making reflector messages FROM: rtty@contesting.com has gone into effect. The downside of this is that we can't see who the originator; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00192.html (24,700 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:51:08 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) The downside of this is that we can't see who the originator is. There are a few people on here for whom I read 100% of their posts. There are others for whom I rea; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00194.html (9,412 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:06:29 -0700 (PDT); Also, when you reply, it doesn't go directly to the person who originated the message. Instead, it works like a Yahoo Group and is addressed back to the entire group. There is generally not good as i; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00198.html (28,449 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:15:31 -0400; It is a shame that the choice is to neuter the list software because of the members who use providers that will not accept e-mail from the list (or for whom their default e-mail behavior is to reject; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00199.html (9,542 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:39:19 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) Don AA5AU REPLY: Exactly. For now, I suggest that senders include their email address in their signature unless, of course, they don't want direct replies. 73, Bill; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00200.html (8,872 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:43:23 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) It seems strange that those providers causing the most problems have interests in large advertising supported web based discussion groups 73, ... Joe, W4TV REPLY: J; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00201.html (9,306 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:45:31 -0400; You're blaming email providers for implementing best practices. If yahoo publishes who's allowed to send on their behalf and gmail takes steps to reject email originating from sources claiming to be; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00202.html (10,750 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:49:25 -0700; 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00203.html (8,422 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:48:14 -0400; Oh, and if you notice, I put my email address in both the To and CC of the prior message. The relector obediently (as it should) copied them to the outbound message. This allows you to do a reply all; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00204.html (11,601 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:58:32 -0400; Not such a good idea moving to Yahoo Groups. Their strings are saturated with advertizing posts intertwined every tenth or so posting. And you can't delete 'em either !!! 73 de Phil - N8PS ORIGINAL M; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00206.html (10,464 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:58:39 -0700; I am on several on both google and yahoo, Google is better than neo yahoo. Jay ws7i It seems strange that those providers causing the most problems have interests in large advertising supported web b; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00207.html (10,014 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:10:54 -0400; I disagree ... Google is essentially useless with traditional e-mail while Yahoo works fine (and avoids the advertising). The question is whether this version of Mailman - or a later version - will s; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00208.html (10,883 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:11:59 -0700; There is apparently a setting in a recent version of mailman to address this very issue. Unfortunately contesting.com is not running that version (2.1.16 or 2.1.17). Let's see if we can urge an updat; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00209.html (13,221 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:16:29 -0400; Web based forums are a blunt instrument when a scalpel is appropriate. With web based forums one is locked into being on-line to participate which may be fine for group based business environments b; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00211.html (11,864 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:40:16 -0500; Bill, Thanks for your efforts. Keep plodding along we will figure it out.. 73 Jim AC0E Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Yes, I'm well; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00212.html (8,458 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:57:46 -0400; Id rather live with the bounces than this......Im with Dave, some people I read every one of their emails, some go right in the trash.....there has to be a better way..... ___________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00214.html (8,773 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:16:32 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Apparently there is a solution, described here: http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DMARC Basically it means updating the Mailman software. I am trying to get i; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00216.html (7,546 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:12:47 -0700; On 4/18/2014 10:06 AM, RTTY wrote: Also, when you reply, it doesn't go directly to the person who originated the message. Instead, it works like a Yahoo Group and is addressed back to the entire grou; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00217.html (8,647 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:04:33 -0500; Bill the fastest way to kill a group is to move it. My 2 cents, Google groups suck and Yahoo groups are still being messed with by management "improvements"......wunderkind CEO. Ron K0IDT ORIGINAL ME; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00219.html (10,578 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] From: RTTY (score: 1): Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 00:02:24 +0200; NO, no and no, with some more no. Sorry but that's wrong Al: Security is not and it not be never a merely negation of problems. Cutting out roots will make any tree much worse and even simply bread; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00225.html (9,947 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]