Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+in\s+the\s+CW\s+Sprint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+in\s+the\s+CW\s+Sprint\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:00:55 -0400; Just thought those that don't subscribe to the contesting reflector, would find this interesting reading? Has someone, other that the "ignored" majority of contesters, finally understood what has bee; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00111.html (9,769 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:39:06 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Before the catfight begins, please remember that from day one, nobody has proposed outlawing SO2R, only that it should be classed as a separate category from SO1; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00112.html (7,252 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:57:12 -0400; When sponsors start enforcing separate categories for antennas with more than one half wavelength in any dimension and antenna supports taller than 50 feet, it will be time to consider a separate ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00116.html (10,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]