Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[rigblaster\]\s+Fw\:\s+Rigblaster\s+Plug\s+\&\s+Play\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[rigblaster\]\s+Fw\:\s+Rigblaster\s+Plug\s+\&\s+Play\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: "Marty W8AKS" <w8aks55@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:39:58 -0800; I took the liberty of forwarding Don's message on to Del at West Mountain and here is his answer, 73 Marty W8AKS Yes the RIGblaster P&P optoisolated CW keying output could be controlled by the MMTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00104.html (10,729 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:15:14 -0400; The narrow IF filters are a significant advantage, not only for the AGC protection but in preventing IMD generation. No audio DSP can prevent the AGC and IMD problems. By the time the detected audio; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00105.html (13,270 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: DONALD A HILL <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT); Thanks Marty. It's what I expected. I don't know that there are a lot of P&P models in use because I don't get too many requests for assistance. Or it could be that they are indeed plug and play a; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00106.html (12,514 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:31:35 -0700; AFC!!! ARRGGGHHHHHH!! Don't get me started! Why did they put this into software? This is why you have a VFO! Is AFC so I can have more FUN chasing those who call me around the band with my RIT? 73 Ji; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00107.html (12,705 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: DONALD A HILL <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:28:41 -0700 (PDT); Jim, AFC is not bad and is quite useful especially when running during contests. It's NET that drives me crazy... 73, Don AFC!!! ARRGGGHHHHHH!! Don't get me started! Why did they put this into sof; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00108.html (13,687 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [rigblaster] Fw: Rigblaster Plug & Play Question (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:59:07 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: A quote from Del Schier, K1UHF, at West Mountain Radio: REPLY: 1. Tuning manually is a "slow and tedious operation"....? and 2.The other advantage of true FSK: No concern about the; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-04/msg00109.html (8,980 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]