Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+ARLB025\s+ARRL\s+seeks\s+comment\s+on\s+draft\"Bandwidth\"\s+petition\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft"Bandwidth" petition (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:59:20 -0700
On Aug 25, 2004, at 5:48 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote: I read this as a good thing. Anyone else? The lower .xxx are moderately confusing: .580 for 80m, .035 for 40m, .065 for 20m, .080 for 15m and .050 f
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00279.html (9,520 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft"Bandwidth" petition (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:02:58 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Yep, it's the same issue when operating USB on 14349. I hear guys there a lot. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00280.html (9,195 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft"Bandwidth" petition (score: 1)
Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:07:24 -0400 (EDT)
Maybe we should ask for .065 (or maybe .070) as the lower limit for 500Hz BW on 15 and 10, as well as on 20, just to make things easier to remember? That would also preserve the status quo on 15M. Th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00281.html (8,872 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment on draft"Bandwidth" petition (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:16:00 -0700
On Aug 25, 2004, at 6:13 PM, Bill Turner wrote: One alternative would be to try using narrower shifts on RTTY, perhaps on the order of 50 Hz or so. There are some technical reasons why this is not a
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00282.html (9,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu