Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GEROGE\s+vs\s+GEORGE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GEROGE\s+vs\s+GEORGE\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:21:50 -0500; Hopefully no one takes this as cheating or publishing information to impact the outcome of the contest. I'm doing this because I've run into this multiple times in a RTTY contest before with the late; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00366.html (7,654 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:18:20 -0500; one guy was sending ARK also, not sure if he dropped the M on purpose or not, log checking sure will be fun to watch on this one....wasn't it last year someone was sending T0M (zero) instead of TOM ?; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00368.html (9,084 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:33:50 -0500; Jamie, Yes it was TOM vs T0M and people did get dinged for that one initially. Anyone with T0M (with a zero) didn't have their contact counted because it was submitted as TOM (with the letter) vs wha; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00370.html (10,248 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] GEROGE vs GEORGE (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:32:21 -0500; "An operator last night, that I see no evidence is on this mailing list, was sending his name as GEROGE vs GEORGE. If I were the log checker, and I'm not, nor will ever be, I would check the station; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00375.html (7,816 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]