Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GRITTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GRITTY\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:03:15 -0500; Been evaluating GRITTY against 2Tone on 20m. I am listening to GM station and 2Tone is giving perfect copy while GRITTY is all over the place often with wrong callsign and at times giving numbers in; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00063.html (7,870 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:31:54 -0700; This is an excellent and insightful evaluation. I am also very interested to see how GRITTY evolves. However, after thousands of (mostly) contest QSOs, I have seen many instances of each of the follo; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00064.html (10,648 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:50:38 -0400; On 2015-04-12 12:31 PM, Ed Muns wrote: Then, after encountering a wider variety of band and signal and activity conditions, I had to conclude that each decoder is superior in certain specific situati; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00065.html (7,329 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:13:17 -0700; As a first step, I'd settle for the current decoders finding a way to display the confidence level metadata along with the text. How about underscoring for high confidence? That said, for me part of; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00066.html (8,283 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:03:08 -0700; Agreed, although I ponder whether it would be "good" for RTTY contesting. Part of the skill, and fun, is quickly using multiple decoder windows to decide if there is good copy. Just like the CW conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00067.html (7,820 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:10:34 -0700; The true breakthrough in RTTY decoding will come when some smart programmer takes multiple copies of 2Tone (with different profiles) plus multiple copies of MMTTY (with different profiles) and GRITTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00069.html (8,568 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:11:58 -0700; Agreed! 73 Jim W7RY Agreed, although I ponder whether it would be "good" for RTTY contesting. Part of the skill, and fun, is quickly using multiple decoder windows to decide if there is good copy. Ju; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00070.html (9,244 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:18:29 -0400; The true breakthrough in RTTY decoding will come when some smart programmer takes multiple copies of 2Tone (with different profiles) plus multiple copies of MMTTY (with different profiles) and GRITT; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00071.html (8,204 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 16:33:39 -0500; Jim I have thought about doing just that. Using it to select the best from the decoders that are built in to 2Tone. What seems to an experienced human to be a simple task to choose the best decode is; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00072.html (9,940 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:11:31 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Or better yet, when some smart programmer comes up with a replacement for RTTY that uses Forward Error Correction (FEC) and is equally fast, or nearly so; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00074.html (8,474 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:14:58 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Whatever NASA is using for their deep space probes seems to work pretty well. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mai; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00075.html (8,220 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:39:01 -0500; No problem there Bill. I'm afraid you may get your wish. There is a new error correcting mode that is going to take over RTTY - and it's coming to a band near you soon! It's called Pactor 4. 73/jeff/; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00076.html (9,104 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:38:08 -0700; "They" said the same about CW, when the CW requirements for licenses are lifted, "NOBODY will be using CW". It's so old fashioned and slow! Ever listen on a CW contest weekend? I rest my case. 73 Jim; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00077.html (10,075 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:28:51 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Isn't that a proprietary software? Us hams want a freebie. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00078.html (8,393 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:37:49 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I just looked up the details of Pactor4. Among other things, the bandwidth required is 2400 Hz. In the contest world that is known as a Non-Starter. Sorr; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00079.html (8,088 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 04:57:48 -0500; Bill It has been done. First you use a synchronous format, which is exactly the same for each and every transmission. Pity RTTY is asynchronous and the stop bit length varies all over the place along; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00080.html (9,669 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:03:55 -0400; Guys, I think maybe Jeff was being ironic, in light of the pending RM. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com. For spots, p; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00082.html (11,118 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:41:01 -0400; I played around just a little with GRITTY as a third decoder in EA RTTY contest weekend before last. (Running on an entirely different PC than my usual 2Tone and MMTTY instances). Watching it do its; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00083.html (8,161 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Alex, VE3NEA" <alshovk@dxatlas.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:10:50 -0400; Hi Tim, You have done an interesting experiment with your Bayesian callsign correlator. I think your experiment failed only because your system missed one important element, a Bayesian squelch. I hop; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00084.html (9,812 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] GRITTY (score: 1): Author: "Alex, VE3NEA" <alshovk@dxatlas.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:30:12 -0400; Hi Joe, GRITTY makes decoded characters, along with confidence information, available via its TCP interface. It is ready for the integration project that you have described. 73 Alex VE3NEA The true b; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-04/msg00115.html (9,079 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]