- 1. [RTTY] HF2V or HV6V (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Martin - MM0BQI" <MM0BQI@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:06:19 -0000
- Tony I use both for RTTY contesting and in my experience they are the best verticals of their type. Have a look through the Butternut Yahoo group for all the info you need. http://groups.yahoo.com/gr
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00211.html (6,597 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] HF2V or HV6V (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:56:03 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No matter how good the commercially made verticals are, you *can* build a better one yourself. The commercial units are always a co
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00220.html (7,319 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] HF2V or HV6V (score: 1)
- Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:22:18 -0800 (PST)
- I built my 80/40 Ground Plane from W9OY (with my own modifications): You can check his Web Page at: http://w9oy.painloss.com/SSvert/SSvert.htm It is light and yeasy to assemble. Lee is a nice guy, al
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00224.html (8,488 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] HF2V or HV6V (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:27:08 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I should qualify the above. The SteppIR vertical may be the exception to the comment about commercial verticals. I don't have one m
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00225.html (7,709 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] HF2V or HV6V (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:29:56 -0800
- Good suggestion Bill. ON4UN's "Low Band DX'ing" is another wealth of information. Built my 3 element 40 meter array from that one. It is better to build 2 separate verticals than trying to make 1 wor
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00245.html (7,500 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu