- 1. [RTTY] I have a question (score: 1)
- Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:50:35 -0400
- Hi everybody, I have a question that I'm sure will find answers amongst this knoledgeble crowd. I thought had this figured out but now I wonder: In log checking procedures, if one station has the cor
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00079.html (6,964 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] I have a question (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:29:41 -0800
- Fabi, I think it depends on the rules of the particular contest. If you have logged the other call and exchange correctly most log checkers will credit you with a good contact even if the other guy b
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00080.html (9,673 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] I have a question (score: 1)
- Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:38:57 -0400
- Hi Gary, that's exactly my point. One could actually modify the way his macros are organized for a particular contest as long as one knows what parameters are used for log correction and maybe avoid
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00081.html (10,621 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] I have a question (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:21:07 -0600
- It really depends on the checkers and the software they are using. If they can determine it was the other guy the blew it then he gets hit. Maybe W0YK will add his 2 dollars worth. Mike W0MU J6/W0MU
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00082.html (11,596 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] I have a question (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:02:09 -0700
- Sorry for the delayed comment, but I just came up for air from harvest this week! I'm spending the day correcting formats on hundreds of logs rejected by the CQ WW RTTY robot so they can be submitted
- /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00109.html (15,268 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu