Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Icom\s+IC\-756\s+PRO\s+III\s+vs\.\s+IC\-7600\s+on\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Icom\s+IC\-756\s+PRO\s+III\s+vs\.\s+IC\-7600\s+on\s+RTTY\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:12:57 -0500; Anyone using the new IC-7600 on RTTY? With the PRO III being closed out, my first instinct was to buy one right away before they are gone (already own one as my primary radio). I actually had two PRO; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00015.html (8,234 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:01:24 -0700; Great question Don! Please let us know what you find out. I too love my 756 Pro III for both RTTY and CW. 73 Jim W7RY -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00018.html (10,233 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Icom IC-756 PRO III vs. IC-7600 on RTTY (score: 1): Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@radioamateur.eu>; Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:27:32 +0200; Hi all, what a question about the 7600! I am not the best one to answer on the subject as I already have written my opinion on eHAM. A great place for everybody of us. Nonetheless I would like to wri; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00036.html (10,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]