Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Intel\s+NUC\,\s+anyone\?\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:40:07 -0500
I've been dancing around replacing the PC at N5UWY (2006 Dell Precision 670 with a Xeon or two - I forget - and 16 GB RAM) for quite some time now but have now been introduced to Intel's little NUC b
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00104.html (7,469 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:29:59 -0500
There is already one person on the N1MM+ reflector that has had issues getting the Icom rig driver to work with his. Beware 73 Jim W7RY I've been dancing around replacing the PC at N5UWY (2006 Dell P
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00105.html (9,032 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:36:57 -0400
So my question is this ... how much of the processing for RTTY is done by the sound device (avoiding $0.99 USB dongles) and how much is done by the CPU? Will their least expensive Core i3 be adequate
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00106.html (9,419 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:53:31 -0500
That would be an issue if I had a USB-equipped Icom which I do not. I covet an "I-Line" of IC-7300, IC-R8600, and IC-9700, but that ain't happening, so ... :-) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00107.html (7,365 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:49:13 -0400
I have two computers in the shack- a 2006 Core Duo running XP with 512 Mb RAM, passmark score of 1,100 and a high end workstation running Windows 10 running on 4 Xeon 2690 CPUs, 32 Gb RAM, SSD, with
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-09/msg00108.html (11,027 bytes)

6. [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 09:01:57 -0400
I have a couple year old NUC and it performs perfectly with Windows 10, N1MM+, MMTTY, 2Tone, GRITTY, my rig, and Winkeyer. I have closely watched CPU usage but would be surprised if it was sucking do
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00000.html (6,854 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 12:52:28 -0400
If, instead, you want high-power machines in the small form-factor, I can heartily recommend the Gigabyte NUCs. They can take desktop i5s and i7s and perform like you would expect a 'normal' system t
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00001.html (9,180 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 11:55:22 -0500
One thing I've wondered about with NUCs is the possible noise generated by the power supplies as well as overall case shielding. Has had any noteworthy results (good or bad) in this area? 73, Matt NQ
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00002.html (9,867 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 13:03:25 -0400
Matt I have not heard of noise complaints, maybe because they are so small you can put them many places. You can consider audible noise and RF noise. For the latter, I think modern quality switcher P
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00003.html (11,914 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 12:09:26 -0500
The other question regarding power is how well do they do on 13.8 V dc? They claim to run on "12-19 V dc" but do they run as well at 13.8 as they do at 19? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | T
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00004.html (7,944 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:29:15 -0700
Another option is to purchase one of the many PCs coming off lease and are refurbished. You can find these on Amazon, Newegg, and so on. With these units you have the opportunity to stay at Win7 if y
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00005.html (9,479 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:05:09 -0400
The ones at K3LR are all individually powered by an small (7 amp?) Astron liner supply.... The other question regarding power is how well do they do on 13.8 V dc? They claim to run on "12-19 V dc" bu
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00009.html (9,141 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:05:43 -0400
power them with a linear supply, no noise.... --Original Message-- From: Matt NQ6N Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 12:55 PM To: Neal Campbell Cc: Tim Shoppa ; RTTY Reflector Subject: Re: [RTTY] Intel
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00010.html (11,126 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:31:02 -0500
So I ended up getting a tall i3 and a 16-GB SODIMM (leaving me a slot for another one just like it down the road). The 40-GB 2.5" SSD I had turned out to be ... not really big enough for W10. Yes, I
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00077.html (11,979 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:59:19 -0400
I googled around and came to Don AA5AU's page and was reminded of EXTFSK ... I gather this will let me use just about any USB-serial adapter for RTTY? Does it also support 75-baud? No. Seems like it
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00078.html (12,883 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 05:22:01 -0500
Using EXTFSK(64) or for that matter 2Tone FSK using bit diddling of a COM port control line is one way of making sure you get extra errors on the far ends decode and being asked to repeat. Windows is
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00079.html (15,027 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:05:37 -0500
No RS-232 headers, either, in a NUC, which I was secretly hoping for. I did also look at the jitter info Oba-san has on his site referring to EXTFSK64. So USB -> RS-232 -> FSK radio port isn't the be
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00080.html (9,179 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:14:57 -0500
Peter As far as I know they just use a USB to COM port adapter probably a chip from FTDI. But why spend money on a box when you can just use AFSK for a very small sum in making your own sound card to
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00081.html (9,723 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:56:48 -0500
Why do some hams use a straight key for CW? A there are any number of keyers and interfaces that can produce perfectly timed CW using a keyboard for input. Still looking for the answer for commercial
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00082.html (9,181 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:07:03 +0000
The best RTTY interface (for FSK anyway) is the Microham. I dont do any soundcard modes, so having a bulletproof interface that just works when I need it is worth something. I have the u2R but I beli
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00083.html (10,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu